Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of treatment response between treatment groups on Schiff cold air sensitivity scale

From: Comparative efficacy of BioMin-F, Colgate Sensitive Pro-relief and Sensodyne Rapid Action in relieving dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled trial

Post-application efficacy intervals

Percentage difference between treatment groups (%age)

Groups

A vs B

Groups

A vs C

Groups

A vs D

Groups

B vs C

Groups

B vs D

Groups

C vs D

Immediate

− 27

− 19

2

8

30

22

 (p value)¥

< 0.001

0.005

0.960

0.499

< 0.001

0.001

Day-3

− 1

− 2

12

1

15

14

 (p value)¥

0.991

0.960

0.084

0.997

0.024

0.041

Week-2

1

11

34

9

32

23

 (p value)¥

0.984

0.152

< 0.001

0.290

< 0.001

< 0.001

Week-4

2

13

36

1

33

22

 (p value)¥

0.971

0.145

< 0.001

0.333

< 0.001

< 0.002

Week-6

1

7

36

6

35

28

 (p value)¥

0.998

0.573

< 0.001

0.680

< 0.001

< 0.001

  1. Group A received BioMin® F. Group B received Colgate Sensitive Pro-relief™
  2. Group C received Sensodyne Rapid Actionâ„¢. Group D received Colgate Totalâ„¢
  3. ¥One way ANOVA: Post Hoc Tukey; p values were considered significant at 0.05
  4. − value means the denominator group showed more clinical reduction in pain due to DH
  5.  + value means numerator group showed more clinical reduction in pain due to DH