Comparative efficacy of BioMin-F, Colgate Sensitive Pro-relief and Sensodyne Rapid Action in relieving dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled trial

Table 6 The secondary outcome measure of Immediate and sustained treatment response in DH on visual analogue scale using water jet stimulus

Post application efficacy intervals	Group A	Group B	Group C	Group D	p value
Immediate					< 0.001^π
(Mean scores ± SD)	5.30 ± 1.83	3.05 ± 2.17	3.75 ± 1.97	5.33 ± 1.93
(p value)^ψ	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
Day 3					0.045^π
(Mean scores ± SD)	4.75 ± 2.26	4.05 ± 1.96	4.60 ± 1.56	5.33 ± 1.90
(p value)^ψ	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
Week 2					< 0.001^π
(Mean scores ± SD)	3.50 ± 1.90	3.14 ± 2.07	3.60 ± 1.46	5.10 ± 1.94
(p value)^ψ	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
Week 4					< 0.001^π
(Mean scores ± SD)	2.30 ± 1.94	2.73 ± 21.98	3.05 ± 1.63	4.67 ± 2.03
(p value)^ψ	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
Week 6					< 0.001^π
(Mean scores ± SD)	1.80 ± 1.73	2.27 ± 1.98	2.75 ± 1.51	4.33 ± 2.03
(p value)^ψ	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
P value	< 0.001^ω	< 0.001^ω	< 0.001^ω	< 0.001^ω

Group A received BioMin® F. Group B received Colgate Sensitive Pro relief™. Group C received Sensodyne Rapid Action™. Group D received Colgate Total™
SD standard deviation
^ψWilcoxon Signed-Rank test; ^πKruskal–Wallis test; ^ωFriedman test; p values were considered significant at 0.05

ISSN: 1472-6831