Study | Animals and tooth movement model | Group Characteristics | Measurement Methodology | Results b | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haruyama et al. [27] | Wistar rats; 10Â weeks; 136Â g NiTi expansion spring between R and L FM [13Â g] Force application: at each stage for 5 cycles | Proestrus Group: 8 estrus Group: 8 Metestrus Group: 8 Diestrus Group: 8 Sample size calculation: nm | Tracings of casts: callipers [at appliance removal] Method error assessment: Yes | Estrus | Metestrus | Diestrus | Proestrus |
* | |||||||
Estrus > Proestrus | |||||||
Tan et al. [28] | Wistar rats; 3Â months; 300Â g NiTi CCS between Mx I and FM [20Â g] Force application: at each stage for 5 cycles | Proestrus Group: 10 Estrus Group: 10 Metestrus Group: 10 Diestrus Group: 10 Sample size calculation: nm | Plaster models: callipers [at appliance removal] Method error assessment: nm | Estrus | Metestrus | Diestrus | Proestrus |
* | |||||||
Estrus > Proestrus | |||||||
Celebi et al. [29] | Cats; 2–4 yrs NiTi CCS from mini implants to Mx C [80 g] Force application: 12d | Estrus Group: 6 a Anestrus Group: 6 Sample size calculation: nm | Silicone impressions: digital callipers [d 0,6,12] Method error assessment: nm | Estrus < Anestrusa |