Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariable analysis of crude association between dental fluorosis and each explanatory variable

From: Hydrogeogenic fluoride in groundwater and dental fluorosis in Thai agrarian communities: a prevalence survey and case–control study

Variable

Cases n (%)

Controls n (%)

Univariable model

PR

95% CI

P-value

Total

132

157

   

Main exposure variable

Time-averaged fluoride concentration (ppm)*

 < 0.7

7 (23.3)

23 (76.7)

 

Reference

 

 0.7–1.49

23 (37.7)

38 (62.3)

1.62

0.78, 3.34

0.195

 ≥ 1.5

127 (64.1)

71 (35.9)

2.75

1.42, 5.31

0.003

Other explanatory variables

Sex

 Female

74 (54.4)

62 (45.6)

 

Reference

 

 Male

83 (54.3)

70 (45.7)

1.0

0.81, 1.23

0.978

Age (year)

 < 8

48 (48.5)

51 (51.5)

 

Reference

 

 ≥ 8

109 (57.4)

81 (42.6)

1.18

0.93, 1.50

0.165

Caregiver’s education

 ≥ Secondary school

28 (54.9)

23 (45.1)

 

Reference

 

 < Secondary school

84 (60.0)

56 (40.0)

1.09

0.82, 1.45

0.540

Sufficiency of family income per month [≥ 26,025 THB]**

 Sufficient

6 (75.0)

2 (25.0)

 

Reference

 

 Insufficient

112 (58.0)

81 (42.0)

0.77

0.51, 1.18

0.230

Breastfeeding

 Yes

107 (56.9)

81 (43.1)

 

Reference

 

 No

20 (83.3)

4 (16.7)

1.46

1.18, 1.82

0.001

Brushing frequency before 2 years old

 No brushing

11 (50.0)

11 (50.0)

 

Reference

 

 Once a day

78 (65.0)

42 (35.0)

1.30

0.84, 2.02

0.241

 ≥ 2 times a day

39 (53.4)

34 (46.6)

1.07

0.67, 1.71

0.783

Brushing frequency at ≥ 2 years old

 Once a day

35 (55.6)

28 (44.4)

 

Reference

 

 ≥ 2 times a day

97 (60.2)

64 (39.8)

1.08

0.84, 1.40

0.532

Fluoride toothpaste use

 No

8 (66.7)

4 (33.3)

 

Reference

 

 Yes

117 (58.8)

82 (41.2)

0.88

0.58, 1.34

0.555

Toothpaste size

 Pea-sized

54 (50.5)

53 (49.5)

 

Reference

 

 > Pea-sized

74 (65.5)

39 (34.5)

1.30

1.03, 1.63

0.027

Fluoride supplement§

 No

95 (59.4)

65 (40.6)

 

Reference

 

 Yes

33 (54.1)

28 (45.9)

0.91

0.70, 1.19

0.491

  1. PR, Prevalence ratio
  2. Row percentage is presented to comply with analysis of prevalence ratio
  3. Univariable model estimated by Poisson regression with robust standard error
  4. *For each child, available measures of groundwater fluoride concentrations in drinking water sources supplying the child’s residence were time-averaged over the period of birth to the survey
  5. **Average family expenditure per month in 2015, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
  6. §Fluoride supplement was not further included in the multivariable model due to the collinearity problem