Table 3 The result of multiple linear regression analysis examining the factors associated with oral health-related quality of life in facial burn patients (N = 271)
(n) | Model 1 (adjusted R2 = 0.81f) | Model 2 (adjusted R2 = 0.79f) | Model 3 (adjusted R2 = 0.79f) |
|---|---|---|---|
|  | Regression coefficient (95%CI) (p) (standardised coefficient, β) |  |  |
Total | – | – | – |
DMFT | 1.7 (1.24, 2.17) | – | – |
(< 0.001) | |||
(0.48) | |||
CPI | 1.1 (0.22, 1.99) | – | – |
(0.01) | |||
(0.12) | |||
OHI-S | 1.0 (− 0.30, 2.38) | – | – |
(0.1) | |||
(0.07) | |||
Clinical oral status | – | 4.7 (3.64, 5.85) | 4.7 (3.80, 5.64) |
(< 0.001) | (< 0.001) | ||
(0.56) | (0.56) | ||
Brushing frequency | 1.9 (0.45, 3.34) | 2.0 (0.44, 3.50) | 1.9 (0.41, 3.42) |
(0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
(0.09) | (0.10) | (0.09) | |
Dental visit | 1.6 (0.46, 2.65) | 1.7 (0.57, 2.89) | 1.5 (0.38, 2.67) |
(0.01) | (0.004) | (0.01) | |
(0.09) | (0.1) | (0.08) | |
Cost as barriers to oral health care utilization |  − 1.3 (− 2.36, − 0.24) |  − 1.5 (− 2.63, − 0.37) | – |
(0.02) | (0.01) | ||
(− 0.07) | (− 0.08) | ||
Time since burn event | – | 1.1 (0.13, 2.05) | – |
(0.02) | |||
(0.12) | |||
Cause of burn | |||
Scald | 2.0 (0.84, 3.22) | 1.4 (0.30, 2.47) | 1.1 (0.08, 2.17) |
(0.001) | (0.01) | (0.04) | |
(0.11) | (0.07) | (0.06) | |
Fire | 1.1 (0.02, 2.21) | – | – |
(< 0.05) | |||
(0.07) | |||
Disfigurement | 0.9 (0.25, 1.48) | – | 1.4 (0.85, 2.02) |
(0.006) | (< 0.001) | ||
(0.15) | (0.26) | ||
SWAP | – | 0.1 (0.14, 0.23) | – |
(0.03) | |||
(0.11) | |||
Interaction: Sex-education |  − 0.4 (− 0.76, − 0.05) |  − 0.4 (− 0.76, − 0.01) |  − 0.4 (− 0.77, − 0.03) |
(0.03) | (< 0.05) | (0.04) | |
(− 0.06) | (− 0.06) | (− 0.06) | |