From: Patient-reported outcome measures for masticatory function in adults: a systematic review
PROMs-abbreviation | PROMs-full name | Author, year of publication | Study participant | Study setting | Study design | Study location | PROM language | Number of items | Item characteristics | Response options | Summary sore (Yes-range/No) | Intended construct and domains |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food items | ||||||||||||
CFS | Chewing function score [31] (Development) | Sato et al., 1989 | 110 older adults; mean age: 71.6 years; female: 58.2%; sample: random | Selected complete denture wearers in dental clinics | Cross-sectional | Japan | Japanese | 20 | 20 food items | Easy (1), difficult (0), impossible (0) to chew | Yes, 0–20 | Chewing function, unidimensional |
ICA-1990 | Index of chewing ability-1990 [32] | Leake, 1990 | 233 older adults | Independently living elders (secondary data) | Cross-sectional | Canada | English | 5 | 9 food items, 5-item index | Yes (1) or No (0) | Yes, 0–5 | Chewing ability, unidimensional |
ICA-2020 | Index of chewing ability-2020 [29] | Montero et al., 2020 | 118 adults; age: 30–86 years; female: 41.5%; | Patients who required rehabilitation in dental hospital | Cohort | Spain | Spanish | 5-item index | 0 = no difficulty, 1 = little, and 2 = much difficulty | - | ||
FIQ-Japanese-1994 | Food intake questionnaire Japanese-1994 [7] | Hirai et al., 1994 | 20 older adults; age: 50–76 years; female: 45% | Complete denture wearers | Cross-sectional | Japan | Japanese | 35 | 35 food items | Easily eaten (2), eaten with difficulty (1), “cannot be eaten” or “do not eat” (0) | Yes, weighted score, 0–100% | Masticatory function |
FIQ-Japanese-1998 | Food intake questionnaire- Japanese-1998 [33] | Miura et al., 1998 | 70 older adults; age: 65–74 years; female: 51.4% | Residents living in Kawaguchiko, Yamanashi Prefecture | Cross-sectional | |||||||
New-FIQ- Japanes | New Food intake questionnaire-Japanese [8] | Koshino et al., 2008 | 262 older adults; mean age: 76.7 years; female: 51.1% | Complete denture wearers | Cross-sectional | Japan | Japanese | 25 | 25 food items | Easily eaten (2), eaten with difficulty (1), “cannot be eaten” or “do not eat” (0) | Yes, weighted score, 0–100% | Masticatory function, 5 factors, namely hardness, fibrous, slippery, sticky, other factor |
FIQ-Chinese-2012 | Food intake questionnaire-Chinese-2012 [38] | Hsu et al., 2012 | 2244 dental patients; age: 45 + years; female: 51.5% | Patients recruited from dental clinics | Cross-sectional | China, Taiwan | Chinese | 14 | 14 food groups | 2 = able to eat, 1 = difficult to eat, 0 = unable to eat | Yes | Masticatory ability |
FIQ-Chinese-2014 | Food intake questionnaire-Chinese-2014 [28] | Hsu et al., 2014 | 332 elders; age: 65 + years; female: 52.1%; sample: convenient | Elders recruited from senior citizens’ service center, community dwelling | Cross-sectional | ‘easy to chew,’ ‘difficult to chew,’ or ‘unable to chew’ | ||||||
PDC-Tanzania | Perceived difficulty of chewing- Tanzania [34] | Sarita et al., 2003 | 850 subjects; age: 20 + years; sample: convenient | 725 subjects with shortened dental arch and 125 subjects with complete dental arch living in urban and rural areas | Cross-sectional | Tanzania | Tanzanian | 20 | 20 food items | 0 = very easily; 1 = minor problems, adapted; 2 = minor problems, not adapted; 3 = difficult but not avoided; 4 = very difficult but not avoided; 5 = very difficult and avoided; 6 = never used that food | Yes, mean score, 0–5 | Difficulty of chewing |
PDC-Sudan | Perceived difficulty of chewing-Sudan [26] | Khalifa et al., 2013 | 1,888 individuals; age:16 + years; female: 59%; sample: consecutive, proportional sampling | Patients attending outpatient dental hospitals (n = 1659) and dental health centres (n = 229) | Cross-sectional | Sudan | Sudanese | 15 | 15 food items | 0 = very easy; 1 = minor problems, adapted; 2 = minor problems, not adapted; 3 = difficult but not avoided; 4 = very difficult but not avoided; 5 = very difficult and avoided; 6 = have never eaten that food | Yes, 0–15 | Difficulty of chewing |
IED | Index of eating difficulty [35] | Zeng et al., 2008 | 1229 participants; age: 55 + years; female: 51.7%; sample: convenient | Elders attending check-up centre for annual health screening | Cross-sectional | China | Chinese | 10 | 5 food groups (10 food items) | Yes or No | Yes, 0–5 | Eating difficulty, unidimensional |
CFQ-Japanese | Alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire [36] | Baba et al., 2009 | 491 subjects, mean age: 63.0 years; female: 71%; sample: consecutive | Partially dentate patients who attended the prosthodontic clinic | Cross-sectional | Japan | Japanese | 20 | 20 food items | Easy (1) or difficult (0) to chew the foods | Yes, 0–20 | Chewing function, unidimensional, one construct |
CFQ-Chinese | Chewing function questionnaire-Chinese [30] | Fan et al., 2021 | 211 elders; mean age: 77.1 years, female: 69.7%; sample: purposive | Elders from a dental hospital, an elderly home and three community elderly centres | Cross-sectional | China | Chinese | 10 | 10 food items | Impossible (1), difficult (2), easy (3) to chew | Yes, 10–30 | Chewing function, unidimensional |
FIAQ | Food intake ability questionnaire [37] | Kim et al., 2009 | 308 adults; age: 20 + years; female: 63.6% | Patients in dental hospitals | Cross-sectional | Korea | Korean | 30 | 30 food items | Cannot chew at all (1), difficult to chew (2), cannot either way (3), can chew some (4), can chew well (5) | Yes, average score, 1–5 | Masticatory function |
FIAQ-key food version | Food intake ability questionnaire- key food version [37] | Kim et al., 2009 | 308 adults; age: 20 + years female: 63.6% | Patients in dental hospitals | Cross-sectional | Korea | Korean | 5 | 5 food items | Cannot chew at all (1), difficult to chew (2), cannot either way (3), can chew some (4), can chew well (5) | Yes, average score, 1–5 | Masticatory function |
MACE | Masticatory ability assessment for community-dwelling elderly [27] | Miura et al., 2013 | 761 elderly subjects; age: 65–84 years; female: 55.1%; | Independent community-dwelling elders | Cross-sectional | Japan | Japanese | 9 | 9 food items | Easy (2), slightly difficult (1), very difficult (0), nonresponse | Yes, 0–18 | Masticatory ability, unidimensional |
Chewing problems | ||||||||||||
MPI | Masticatory problem index [39] | Tsuga et al., 1998 | 160 elders; age: 80-year-old; female: 53.8%; sample: random | Elders living in their own homes, not institutionalized and could travel to the clinical examination | Cross-sectional | Sweden | Swedish | 13 | 13 items related to chewing problems | – | Yes | Masticatory problem |
Subset-OHIP | Subset of the oral health impact profile [40] | Cusson et al., 2015 | 1,789 older adults; age: 67–84 years; sample: random | Community-dwelling adults | Cross-sectional | Canada | English | 7 | 7 items related to chewing problems | Always, often, occasionally, rarely, never | Yes, 0–28 | Masticatory efficiency, unidimensional |
SMDOA | Screening for masticatory disorders in older adults [41] | Cavalcanti et al., 2019 | 295 older adults; age: 60 + years; female: 86.4%; sample: convenient | Adults in social centers for epidemiological screening purpose | Cross-sectional | Brazil | Portuguese | 9 | 9 items related to chewing problems | No, Yes-sometimes, Yes-always | No. Detect change in chewing function | Masticatory disorders, unidimensional. Two factors: 1. chewing function 2. masticatory perception |
Food items and chewing problems | ||||||||||||
CFQ-Croatian | Chewing function questionnaire-Croatian [44] | Peršić et al., 2013 | 224 participants; age:19–85 years; female: 48.0% sample: convenient | Dental students and prosthodontic patients for daily clinical practice and research | Cohort | Croatia | Croatian and English | 10 | 10 items, including food items and items related to chewing problems | 0 = never, 1 = hardly ever, 2 = occasionally, 3 = fairly, 4 = very often or extreme difficulties | Yes, 0–40 | Chewing function, unidimensional |
CFQ-Albanian | Albanian version of chewing-function questionnaire [43] | Bimbashi et al., 2016 | 205 subjects; age:19–86 years; female: 53.2% sample: random (36), consecutive (61), convenient (108) | General population, dental students and prosthodontic patients for research and clinical trials | Cohort | Republic of Kosovo | Albanian | |||||
QMFQ-Persian | Persian version of the quality of masticatory function questionnaire [42] | Khodaeian et al., 2016 | 62 edentulous patients; age: 45–75 years; female: 50%; sample: convenient | Complete denture wearers referred from hospitals | Cross-sectional | Iran | Persian | 27 | 27 items, including food items and items related to chewing problems | “always = 1” to “never = 5” or “a lot = 1” to “no difficulty = 5” | Yes, 27–135 | Masticatory function, five domains: masticatory problems with dentures, problems while consuming apple and carrot, meat products, fruits and vegetables, and changes need for better swallowing |
One global question | ||||||||||||
SMF-Yanagisawa | Self-reported masticatory function [45] | Yanagisawa et al. 2010 | 2668 adults; age: 40–75 years; female: 59.1%; sample: convenient | Community residents recruited by mail | Cross-sectional | Japan | Japanese | 1 | 1 global question. “Can you bite tightly with your back teeth and dentures?” | Yes, I can bite tightly on both sides; Yes, but only on one side; No, I cannot on either side | No | Masticatory function |
SMF-Ueno | Self-reported masticatory status (function) [46] | Ueno et al., 2018 | 2356 adults; age: 40–75 years; female: 67.9%; sample: convenient | Community residents recruited on-site or by mail | Cross-sectional | Japan | Japanese |