Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive statistics of the RMS values for precision (μm)

From: Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study

 

PG

IOS

CNV

Median

2.00

36.00

28.70

Mean

2.32

37.07

29.72

IQR

1.65

9.95

4.80

SD

0.85

3.98

7.85

  1. PG photogrammetry, IOS intraoral scanner, CNV conventional impression, IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation
Back to article page

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us