Skip to main content

Table 2 Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for different movements among the three software packages, in comparison to the digital setup

From: Digital model superimpositions: are different software algorithms equally accurate in quantifying linear tooth movements?

Movements

Type

Digital Setup vs. Geomagic

Digital Setup vs. OrthoAnalyzer

Digital Setup vs. Compare

ICC

95% CI

ICC

95% CI

ICC

95% CI

OG

Maxillary

0.958*

0.944–0.969

0.663*

0.452–0.784

0.901*

0.851–0.932

Mandibular

0.869*

0.825–0.902

0.552*

0.431–0.652

0.910*

0.881–0.933

Overall

0.911*

0.889–0.928

0.615*

0.501–0.701

0.911*

0.887–0.930

MD

Maxillary

0.965*

0.955–0.973

0.670*

0.582–0.740

0.905*

0.877–0.927

Mandibular

0.871*

0.834–0.900

0.589*

0.494–0.669

0.917*

0.893–0.936

Overall

0.914*

0.897–0.928

0.624*

0.563–0.679

0.912*

0.894–0.926

BL

Maxillary

0.968*

0.959–0.976

0.730*

0.660–0.787

0.920*

0.896–0.938

Mandibular

0.873*

0.834–0.903

0.606*

0.508–0.689

0.925*

0.901–0.943

Overall

0.928*

0.913–0.940

0.676*

0.619–0.726

0.922*

0.906–0.935

  1. ICC Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, CI Confidence Interval, LL: Lower Limit, UL Upper Limit, OG Occlusogingival, MD Mesiodistal, BL Buccolingual
  2. *All values were significant at p ≤ 0.001∙