Table 3 Multiple comparisons for Fracture Load values of specimens that aging was not applied
From: The influence of aging on the fracture load of milled monolithic crowns
(I) Material | (J) Material | Average difference (I-J) | SD | p** | 95% confidence interval for the difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
Aging was not applied | IPS e.max | Cerasmart | 366.590 | 235.806 | .395 | -235.296 | 968.476 |
Enamic | 902.941a | .002 | 301.055 | 1504.827 | |||
Cerasmart | IPS e.max | -366.590 | .395 | -968.476 | 235.296 | ||
Enamic | 536.351 | .093 | -65.535 | 1138.237 | |||
Enamic | IPS e.max | -902.941a | .002 | -1504.827 | -301.055 | ||
Cerasmart | -536.351 | .093 | -1138.237 | 65.535 | |||