Table 4 Multiple comparisons for Fracture Load values of specimens that aging was applied
From: The influence of aging on the fracture load of milled monolithic crowns
(I) Material | (J) Material | Average difference (I-J) | SD | p** | 95% confidence interval for the difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
Aging was applied | IPS e.max | Cerasmart | 202.519 | 227.624 | 1.000 | -378.481 | 783.519 |
Enamic | 802.798a | .005 | 221.798 | 1383.798 | |||
Cerasmart | IPS e.max | -202.519 | 1.000 | -783.519 | 378.481 | ||
Enamic | 600.279a | .041 | 19.279 | 1181.279 | |||
Enamic | IPS e.max | -802.798a | .005 | -1383.798 | -221.798 | ||
Cerasmart | -600.279a | .041 | -1181.279 | -19.279 | |||