Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of the included studies evaluating bacterial infiltration

From: Immediate and Delayed Post Space Preparations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Scoping Review

Author

(Year)

Sample size

(N)

Groups

Rotary system/

Apical size

Filling material/ Obturation technique

Bacteria type

PSP technique

Measurement

Time of immediate PSP

Time of delayed PSP

Outcome

Sharma et al.

(2020) [68]

32

GA: CLC, imm/ GB:MTA plug,imm/ GC:4mm MTA plug, delay

K-file/

#40

GP/ MTA plug

N.r.

N.r.

bacterial leakage test

Immediately

N.r.

Immediate – delay

GA> GB – GC

GP > MTA plug

Reyhani et al.

(2015) [69]

76

G1: AH Plus, imm/ G2: AH Plus, 1W/ G3: MTA Fillapex, imm/ G4: MTA Fillapex, 1W

Race rotary files/ #25, 6%

GP/ MTA Fillapex ,

AH Plus sealer/ LC

E.F/

90 days

Peeso reamer #3

bacterial microleakage system; number of samples with leakage during study

Immediately

7 days

Immediate - delay

MTA Fillapex - AH Plus

Nikhil et al.

(2011) [66]

90

G1ax: AH 26, imm, 5mm GP/ G1ay: AH 26, imm ,4mm GP+1mm GIC/ G1bx: AH 26, 1W, 5mm GP/ G1by: AH 26, 1W, 4mm GP+1mm GIC/ G2ax: Resilon+Epiphany, imm, 5mm resilon/ G2ay: Resilon+Epiphany, imm, 1mm GIC/ G2bx: Resilon+Epiphany, 1W, 5mm resilon/ G2by: Resilon+Epiphany, 1W, 4mm GP+1mm GIC

K-file/

#40

GP/AH26 , Resilon/Epiphan/ LC

Staphylococcus species/ 90 days

heated pluggers

bacterial microleakage test

Immediately

7 days

Delay > immediate

Jalalzadeh et al.

(2010) [67]

86

GA: imm, AH26/ GB: imm, ZOE/ GC: 1W, AH26/ GD: 1W, ZOE

K-file/

#35

GP/ AH26, ZOE sealer/ LC

Staphylococcus epidermidis/ 70 days

Peeso reamer #3

bacterial microleakage test

Immediately

7 days

Immediate - delay

ZOE: Immediate - delay

AH26: Delay > immediate

ZOE – AH26

Zmener et al.

(2010) [19]

48

G1: EndoREZ (A_), 22min / G2: EndoREZ (A+), 8 min / G3: EndoREZ (A_), 1 W / G4: EndoREZ (A+),1 W

K-file/

#40

GP/ EndoREZ sealer with or without

accelerator / LC

E.F/ 60 days

Gates Glidden #2-5/

Para Post System drill #5, 5.5, 6

Dual-chamber microbial leakage model; % teeth without coronal bacterial leakage

22 min,

8 min

7 days

Delay > immediate

(A+) - (A_)

Lyons et al.

(2009) [71]

80

G1: imm/ G2: delay/ G3: imm/ G4: delay

EndoSequence/

#50 .06

Resilon + Epiphany sealer / WVC-System B- Obtura II

S.M/

3, 7, 10, 14 up to

maximum 28 days

System B + Gates Glidden

Dual-chamber microbial leakage model; % teeth with bacterial leakage

Immediately

5 days

Immediate - delay

all groups showed leakage after 14 days: failure of the Resilon/Epiphany to create a true ‘monoblock’

Grecca et al.

(2009) [70]

66

G1: imm, burs/ G2: 1W, burs/ G3: imm, heated pluggers / G4: 1W, heated pluggers/ G5: imm, solvent/ G6: 1W, solvent

K-file/

#50

GP/

AH Plus sealer/ Tagger’s hybrid technique

E.F/

90 days

LA Axxess

Bur/ heated pluggers /solvent xylol

Dual-chamber device; number of teeth with bacterial leakage

Immediately

7 days

Immediate - delay

Bur - heated pluggers - solvent

  1. (A+)/(A_); with or without accelerator, CLC cold lateral compaction, G group, GP gutta-percha, imm Immediate, L lateral condensation, mm millimeter, MTA mineral trioxide aggregate, N.r. not reported, PSP post space preparation, W week, WVC warm vertical compaction, ZOE zinc oxide eugenol sealer, - ; similar outcome.