Skip to main content

Table 4 Maximum tensile strength and maximum shear strength values (MPa) at dentin-restoration interfaces

From: Effect of partial restorative treatment on stress distributions in non-carious cervical lesions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Model

CR

GIC

MTA

MTS

MSS

MTS

MSS

MTS

MSS

A1

34.90

6.21

29.16

5.40

33.89

6.31

A2

41.30

7.74

33.45

6.81

39.87

7.37

A3

38.00

6.54

29.05

4.66

36.33

6.30

A4

15.38

3.73

11.07

2.67

15.58

3.53

B1

10.62

5.43

7.89

3.95

10.22

5.20

B2

44.75

17.56

38.00

14.39

43.40

17.35

B3

50.36

8.69

41.79

7.58

48.71

8.41

B4

16.96

3.45

14.06

2.68

16.41

3.38

C1

0.63

0.81

0.38

0.54

0.60

0.77

C2

2.94

1.50

1.84

0.94

2.81

1.43

C3

35.94

16.92

26.91

11.60

34.10

16.02

C4

16.58

3.65

14.14

2.98

16.25

3.58

Ultimate tensile strength

92.80

 

11.80

 

7.21

 

Bond strength

60.00

25.30

9.30

6.30

12.00

2.51

  1. CR composite resin, GIC glass-ionomer cement, MTA mineral trioxide aggregate, MTS maximum tensile strength, MSS maximum shear strength