Skip to main content

Table 5 The related factors and attitudes of clinicians toward DGTs analyzed by the chi-square test

From: Investigation on the application of digital guide templates guided dental implantation in China

Attitudes toward DGTs

Professional backgrounds of clinicians

 

Working years

 

Clinical implant

Clinical non-implant

Non-clinical

P

Layman

Novice

Advanced

Master

Expert

P

n = 204 (%)

n = 56 (%)

n = 13 (%)

n = 22 (%)

n = 40 (%)

n = 59 (%)

n = 69 (%)

n = 83 (%)

Views on the accuracy of DGTs and FH

   

0.016*

     

0.005**

 DGTs are more accurate

189 (92.6)

52 (92.9)

11 (84.6)

 

18 (81.8)

38 (95.0)

57 (96.6)

64 (92.8)

75 (90.4)

 

 FH is more accurate

12 (5.9)

1 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

 

1 (4.5)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

5 (7.2)

7 (8.4)

 

 There’s not much difference between them

2 (1.0)

2 (3.6)

2 (15.4)

 

3 (13.6)

1 (2.5)

2 (3.4)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

Whether the accuracy of DGT-guided implantation meets clinical requirements?

   

0.047*

     

0.048*

 Higher than clinical requirements

29 (14.2)

8 (14.3)

3 (23.1)

 

5 (22.7)

9 (22.5)

5 (8.5)

11 (15.9)

10 (12.0)

 

 Clinical requirements have been basically met

162 (79.4)

36 (64.3)

9 (69.2)

 

11 (50.0)

30 (75.0)

48 (81.4)

54 (78.3)

64 (77.1)

 

 Clinical requirements have not been met

11 (5.4)

10 (17.9)

1 (7.7)

 

6 (27.3)

1 (2.5)

5 (8.5)

3 (4.3)

7 (8.4)

 

Can the use of DGTs eliminate the influence of surgical experience on accuracy

   

0.217

     

0.980

 Yes

108 (52.9)

23 (41.1)

3 (23.1)

 

9 (40.9)

20 (50.0)

30 (50.8)

33 (47.8)

42 (50.6)

 

 No

43 (21.1)

12 (21.4)

4 (30.8)

 

5 (22.7)

8 (20.0)

10 (16.9)

15 (21.7)

21 (25.3)

 

 Only the full-guided templates can do

48 (23.5)

20 (35.7)

6 (46.2)

 

8 (36.4)

11 (27.5)

18 (30.5)

19 (27.5)

18 (21.7)

 

Are the extra time and economic costs of using DGTs worthwhile?

   

0.390

     

0.019*

 Yes

182 (89.2)

49 (87.5)

10 (76.9)

 

15 (68.2)

39 (97.5)

49 (83.1)

65 (94.2)

73 (88.0)

 

 No

13 (6.4)

6 (10.7)

1 (7.7)

 

5 (22.7)

0 (0.0)

7 (11.9)

1 (1.4)

7 (8.4)

 
  1. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01