Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Oral Health

Fig. 3

From: Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of uncemented CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia three-unit restorations in anterior areas, using scannable and conventional polyvinyl siloxane impression materials

Fig. 3

The mean and standard deviations of marginal discrepancy of the two impression methods. C: conventional method, S: Scannable method. B1: central mid buccal, L1: central mid lingual, M1: central mid mesial, D1: central mid distal, B3: canine mid buccal, L3: canine mid lingual, M3: canine mid mesial, D3: canine mid distal

Back to article page