Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis of results of different groups at different time points

From: Do different incision techniques for implant surgery affect gingival papilla height around dental implants? A retrospective study of 115 cases

∆V

Values

Statistical analysis

V1–V2

A

0.0453 ± 0.0140

A versus. B: P > 0.9999

A versus C: P > 0.9999

B versus C: P > 0.9999

Kruskal–Wallis test

B

0.0469 ± 0.0163

C

0.0394 ± 0.0093

V2–V3

A

0.0827 ± 0.0138

A versus B: P < 0.0001

A versus C: P = 0.0002

B versus C: P = 0.2649

Kruskal–Wallis test

B

 − 0.0036 ± 0.0078

C

0.0143 ± 0.0049

V1–V4

A

0.1616 ± 0.0200

A versus B: P = 0.0017

A versus C: P = 0.0015

B versus C: P = 0.7772

Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA tests

B

0.0634 ± 0.0168

C

0.0796 ± 0.0079

  1. Results are presented as the mean ± standard error