Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the different studied periods according to percentage of TDMH and newly formed dentin area to total surface area of the exposure site

From: Biodegradation of an injectable treated dentin matrix hydrogel as a novel pulp capping agent for dentin regeneration

 

Extraction intervals

F

p

2 Weeks (n = 5)

8 Weeks (n = 5)

12 Weeks (n = 5)

16 Weeks (n = 5)

Percent of TDMH to total surface area of exposure site

      

Mean ± SD

58.8a ± 5.9

40.4b ± 3.2

21.02c ± 3.2

9.8d ± 3.3

139.97*

 < 0.001*

Percent of new dentin to total surface area of exposure site

      

Mean ± SD

9.5d ± 2.8

34.9c ± 4.6

68.6b ± 2.3

82.9a ± 3.8

450.95*

 < 0.001*

  1. Means with common letters are not significant (i.e. Means with Different letters are significant)
  2. F, F for One way ANOVA test, Pairwise comparison bet. each 2 groups was done using Post Hoc Test (Bonferroni). p, p value for comparing between the different extraction intervals
  3. *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05