Skip to main content

Table 6 Relationship of oral status variables with nutritional variables

From: Oral status and affecting factors in Iranian ICU patients: a cross-sectional study

Oral status variables

Saliva status

tongue status

Teeth status

Clinical variables

Mean(SD)

Mean rank

Mean(SD)

Mean rank

Mean(SD)

Mean rank

Diet Method

vein

2.16(0.93)

79.75

1.83(0.75)

72.67

11.83(1)

57.13

gavage

1.93(0.91)

70.49

1.84(73)

72.03

2.27(1)

68.73

oral

1.42(0.85)

49.25

1.64(73)

60.93

2.21(0.69)

63.21

other

2(1.03)

71.98

1.73(73)

65.92

2.55(1.06)

78.5

Statistical analysis

(Kruskal–Wallis test)

K2 = 5.26

p = 0.15

K2 = 1.52

p = 0.47

K2 = 3.55

P = 0.31

Food type

Intralipid

1.75(0.96)

62.58

1.67(0.65)

64.46

22.25(0.96)

68.29

Homemade food

1.66(1.07)

57.88

1.75(0.74)

67.88

1.92(1.16)

58

Food package

1.98(0.89)

72.52

1.91(0.8)

75.04

2.29(0.99)

70.02

Hospital food

1.5(0.84)

52.6

1.5(0.7)

54.6

2(0.94)

54.2

NPO

2.08(1.01)

75.41

1.78(0.75)

69.09

2.51(1.12)

77.78

other

1.91(0.9)

70.08

1.67(0.65)

64.46

2.25(1.05)

67.04

Statistical analysis

(Kruskal–Wallis test)

K2 = 4.95

P = 0.42

K2 = 3.35

p = 0.64

K2 = 4.56

p = 0.47

NG-Tube

yes

2.01(0.44)

73.41

1.82(0.74)

70.94

2.23(1.07)

71.23

No

1.27(0.66)

43.44

1.62(0.74)

59.85

2.06(0.8)

58

Statistical analysis

(Mann–Whitney U test)

Z = -3.18

*p = 0.001

Z = -1.18

p = 0.23

Z = -1.38

p = 0.16

  1. * is significant