Skip to main content

Table 6 Test statistics and p-values of the relationship between dental anxiety level and variables of the participants (N = 500)

From: Relationship between dental anxiety levels and oral health among dental patients in Turkey: a cross-sectional study

Variable

N (%)

Statistical Test

p

Total number of teeth

 

Chi-square

x2 = 9.510

0.050***

 1–9

7 (1.4)

 10–19

44 (8.8)

 ≥20

449 (89.8)

Had any dental filling experience

 

Chi-square

x2 = 0.809

0.667***

 No

11 (2.2)

 Yes

489 (97.8)

First dental filling

 

Chi-square

x2 = 9.558

0.145***

 <12

141 (28.2)

 12–18 years old

134 (26.8)

 >18 years old

111 (22.2)

 Unclear

114 (22.8)

Pain during first dental filling

 

Mann–Whitney U

U = 12571.000

≤0.001**

 No

334 (66.8)

 Yes

166 (33.2)

Pain during current filling

 

Mann–Whitney U

U = 4929.500

≤0.001**

 No

462 (92.4)

 Yes

38 (7.6)

Sensation of the current filling experience

 

Kruskal–Wallis

X2 = 177.224

≤0.001*

 Bada

76 (15.2)

 Not badb

224 (44.8)

 Goodc

200 (40)

Postponed current appointment

 

Mann–Whitney U

U = 5250.500

≤0.001**

 No

457 (91.4)

 Yes

43 (8.6)

Had any restoration on tooth surfaces

 

Mann–Whitney U

U = 25486.500

0.861**

 No

335 (71)

 Yes

145 (29)

Application of local anesthesia

 

Mann–Whitney U

U = 12847.000

0.014**

 No

427 (85.4)

 Yes

73 (14.6)

Who performed the treatment?

 

Mann–Whitney U

U = 18472.500

0.151**

 Intern

398 (79.6)

 Lecturer

102 (20.4)

Restorative material used

 

Chi-square

x2 = 2.742

0.602***

 Amalgam

1 (0.2)

 Composite

497 (99.4)

 Glass ionomer

2 (0.4)

  1. *Kruskal–Wallis test (X2),
  2. **Mann–Whitney U test (U)
  3. ***Chi-square test (x2): test statistics. Bold numbers indicate statistical significance, p < 0.05. Different lowercase superscripts show a statistically significant difference between the columns and variable groups