Skip to main content

Table 1 Criteria for follow-up evaluation of ART restorations and sealants (according to Roeleveld et al., [19])

From: One-year follow-up of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment(ART) for dental caries in children undergoing oncohematological treatment: a pragmatic trial

Code

Evaluation characteristics

00

Restoration present, correct

10

Restoration present, slight marginal defect/wear of surface (<0.5 mm). No repair needed.

11

Restoration present, gross marginal defect/wear of surface (>0.5 mm). Repair needed.

12

Restoration present, underfilled (>0.5 mm). Repair needed.

13

Restoration present, overfilled (>0.5 mm). Repair needed.

20

Secondary caries, discoloration in depth, surface hard and intact, caries within dentin. Repair needed.

21

Secondary caries, surface defect, caries within dentin. Repair needed.

30

Restoration not present, bulk fracture, moving or partial lost. Repair needed.

40

Inflammation of the pulp; signs of dentogenic infection (abscesses, fistulae, pain complaints). Restoration might still be in situ. Extraction needed.

50

Tooth not present because of extraction

60

Tooth not present because of shedding

70

Tooth not present because of extraction or shedding

90

Patient not present