Skip to main content

Table 2 Principal elements of the studies which formed part of the present systematic analysis

From: Accuracy of temporomandibular disorders diagnosis evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (DC/TDM) Axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Nationality

Number of case vs. control

Age

Diagnostic tool of TMD

Correlation between Axis I and II

Significance of study

Alrashdan

2022

Jordan

98 patients/49 patients

32.7 years

DC/TMD Axis I

DC/TMD Axis II

Pain related TMD r 0.312

0.002*

IAD r − .309 0.002*

Headeche r 0.317

0.001*

Association between clinical symptoms and psychosocial status

Winocur-Arias

2022

Israel

255 patients/66 patients

37 yrs

DC/TMD Axis I

DC/TMD Axis II

Myofascial pain. With referral 6.38 ± 5.61 6.00 (2.00–8.00)

P:0.033*

Myofascial pain with referral is associated and correlated with increased depressive state and thus with Axis II

Reiter

2021

Israel

220 patients/60 patients

37.8 yrs

DC/TMD Axis I

DC/TMD Axis II

Patients with HAattrTMD

Evaluated in axis I and II (P = .008)*

HAattrTMD group had significantly higher levels of depression

Yildiz

2023

Turkey

200 patients/507 patients

28.46

DC/TMD Axis I

DC/TMD Axis II

TMJ internal disorders association with Axis II

0.206*

The results of DC / TMD Axis I are compared with Axis II

  1. *Statistically significant correlation