Skip to main content

Table 4 Pairwise comparisons of sensitivity and specificity

From: Performance of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in comparison to conventional computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of bone invasion in oral squamous cell cancer (OSCC): a prospective study

  1. McNemar, p-values and in brackets number of misclassifications per procedure, CBCT = cone-beam computed tomography, CT = computed tomography, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging. In the grey area (specificity) the first value refers to the column, the second to the row. In the white area (sensitivity) the first value refers to the row, the second to the column
  2. + The sensitivity of CBCT and CT did not differ significantly (p = 0.059) with one misclassification of CBCT when CT classification was correct and six misclassifications of CT when CBCT classification was correct
Back to article page

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us