Skip to main content

Table 5 Initially predicted and finally achieved changes in individual teeth movement of the completed patients

From: Does aligner refinement have the same efficiency in deep bite correction?: A retrospective study

 

N

Predicted

Achieved

Significance

Difference

 

N

Predicted

Achieved

Significance

Difference

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

 

Maxillary Arch – Vertical (mm)

 

Mandibular Arch– Vertical (mm)

U1 Vertical

30

1.02

0.96

-0.29

1.48

*

1.31

L1 Vertical

30

2.57

2.14

1.59

1.84

*

0.98

U2 Vertical

30

1.09

0.90

0.16

1.50

*

0.93

L2 Vertical

27

2.54

2.11

1.48

1.94

*

0.89

U3 Vertical

30

1.05

0.77

-0.11

1.18

*

1.16

L3 Vertical

30

1.66

1.67

1.02

1.76

*

0.63

U4 Vertical

30

0.61

0.39

0.07

0.76

*

0.54

L4 Vertical

28

0.63

0.59

0.56

1.50

*

0.07

U5 Vertical

28

0.47

0.28

0.18

0.46

*

0.29

L5 Vertical

28

0.35

0.34

0.09

1.61

*

0.26

Maxillary Arch – Inclination (°)

 

Mandibular Arch – Inclination (°)

U1 Torque

30

6.59

5.87

2.50

5.24

*

4.08

L1 Torque

30

7.93

6.24

0.42

6.24

*

7.51

U2 Torque

30

4.07

4.48

2.08

7.35

 

2.62

L2 Torque

27

8.52

6.31

0.00

5.29

*

8.52

  1. A negative sign indicates that the opposite movement was observed
  2. *Statistically significant at the p < .05 value