Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of dentists’ preferences within constructed smile groups (n = 143)

From: Smile aesthetics in Pakistani population: dentist preferences and perceptions of anterior teeth proportion and harmony

Smile Preference

Group (A) Golden proportion

p-value

Normal N%

Small N%

Tall N%

Very tall N%

 

Good

71 (49.65)

6 (4.19)

27 (18.88)

3 (2.09)

0.001

Fair

32 (22.37)

5 (3.49)

9 (6.29)

5 (3.49)

 

Bad

40 (27.97)

138 (96.50)

107 (74.82)

135 (94.40)

 

Total

143 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

 

Group (B) Recurring esthetic dental proportion

Good

83 (58.04)

1 (0.69)

4 (2.79)

3 (2.09)

0.001

Fair

42 (29.37)

9 (6.29)

7 (4.89)

4 (2.79)

 

Bad

18 (12.58)

133 (93)

132 (92.30)

136 (95.10)

 

Total

143 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

 

Group (C) Golden percentage

Good

55 (38.46)

7 (4.89)

3 (2.09)

2 (1.39)

0.001

Fair

30 (20.97)

5 (3.49)

4 (2.79)

6 (4.19)

 

Bad

58 (40.55)

131 (91.60)

136 (95.10)

135 (94.40)

 

Total

143 (100)

132 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

 

Group (D) Preston proportion

Good

38 (26.57)

4 (2.79)

4 (2.79)

5 (3.49)

0.001

Fair

52 (36.36)

6 (4.19)

7 (4.89)

4 (2.79)

 

Bad

53 (37.06)

133 (93)

132 (92.30)

134 (93.70)

 

Total

143 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

 

Group (E) Local proportion

Good

23 (16.08)

11 (7.69)

2 (1.39)

2 (1.39)

0.001

Fair

23 (16.08)

5 (3.49)

5 (3.49)

3 (2.09)

 

Bad

97 (67.83)

127 (88.81)

136 (95.10)

138 (96.50)

 

Total

143 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

143 (100)

 
  1. Group A: golden proportion, Group B: recurrent esthetic dental proportion, Group C: golden percentage, Group D: Preston proportion, Group D: Local/observed proportion: The proportion ratio between the width of anterior teeth obtained in this study was used to construct a smile with different teeth length, P value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant