Author, year | Additive | Property | n | Results [± SD] | Conclusion | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CaCl2 | Na2HPO4 | PGa | STb | CSc | pH | Ca2+ ion release | cytotoxicity | ||||
Jamali Zavare, F. 2020 [23] | 5% CaCl2 |  |  |  |  |  | X |  | 3 | MTA 1 day: 281 ± 8 Day 7:318 ± 15 Day 14: 761 ± 34 MTA + 5% CaCl2 1 day: 268 ± 16 Day 7: 607 ± 8 Day 14: 810 ± 15 | The addition of CaCl2 to MTA and CEM cement decreased their setting time and increased pH and Ca2+ ion release |
Mokhtari, H. 2018 [24] |  | 2.5% wt. Na2HPO4 |  |  | X |  |  |  | 10 | 1D WMTA + liquid 50%: 42.15 ± 1.50 60%: 41.33 ± 2.09 70%: 37.79 ± 1.28 Na2HPO4 WMTA + liquid 50%: 41.44 ± 1.77 60%: 43.72 ± 1,78 70%: 37.37 ± 1.62 21 D WMTA + liquid 50%: 63.25 ± 1.96 60%: 59.51 ± 1.50 70%: 57.27 ± 1.26 Na2HPO4 WMTA + liquid 50%: 62.39 ± 1.39 60%: 63.96 ± 1.40 70%: 59.78 ± 1.03 | Adding 2.5% wt. Na2HPO4 to MTA increased samples CS |
Mokhtari, H. 2018 [25] |  | 2.5% wt. Na2HPO4 |  | X |  |  |  |  | 30 | Final setting time WMTA = 182.00 ± 57.86 NAMTA = 67.00 ± 14.42 | Adding 2.5% wt. Na2HPO4 to MTA reduces ST |
Kulan, P. 2018 [26] | 5% CaCl2 | 2.5% Na2HPO4 |  |  |  |  |  | MTS | 3 | CaCl2 5% 1 d = 100 ± 10 7 d = 74.4 ± 14 21 d = 81.3 ± 14 Na2HPO4 2.5% 1 d = 91.4 ± 31 7 d = 56.1 ± 10 21 = 40.9 ± 15 DW 1 d = 97.8 ± 2.1 7 d = 73.4 ± 1.1 21 d = 38.7 ± 20 | All MTA samples increased the proliferation of DPSCs |
Ahmed, H. 2018 [14] | 10% CaCl2 |  |  |  |  |  |  | MTS | 3 | 24h 200 mg/ml (full concentration) DW: 21.8 ± 14.5 Fs: 0 72 h 200 mg/ml DW: 10.1 ± 1.4 Fs: 0 | addition of CaCl2.2H2O increases the cytotoxicity but enhances the dentinogenic differentiation potential of MTA on DPSCs |
Ahmad, A. 2017 [27] | 10% CaCl2 |  |  |  |  |  |  | MTT | 3 | 24h 50mg/ml Fs = 10 ± 5 DW = 17.5 ± 2.5 72h 50mg/ml Fs = 2.5 ± 2 DW = 20 ± 7.5 DW = 112 ± 22 | Admixture of 10% CaCl2 with MTA has a favorable biological profile towards HPLFs |
Sobhnamayan, F. 2017 [28] |  |  | 20%, 50% and 100% PG |  | X |  |  |  | 15 | mean (median) ± SD DAY 7 100% PG: 20 (20) ± 4.56 50% PG: 22 (22.3) ± 2.52 20% PG: 18 (19.9) ± 6.31 100% DW: 10 (11) ± 3.20 | The appropriate concentration of PG could improve the CS of MTA and CEM cement |
Marciano, M. A. 2016 [6] |  |  | 20% PG | X |  | X | X |  | 10 | MTA + DW Initial setting time (min): 13.60 ± 1.30 Final setting time: 68.33 ± 1.53 MTA + PG Initial setting time 17.31 ± 1.40 Final setting time 103.00 ± 3.35 | The addition of PG to MTA resulted in a longer final setting time than MTA + DW For MTA + PG, higher values of pH and Ca release were observed in the final period of 168 h |
Kulan, P. 2016 [29] | 5%, 10% CaCl2, | 2/5% wt. Na2HPO4 |  |  |  |  |  | MTS | 3 | CaCl2 10% 1D = 51.6 ± 18.6 3 d = 50.6 ± 8 7 d = 28.5 ± 8 CaCl2 5% 1 d = 64.1 ± 9 3 d = 70.1 ± 9.8 7 d = 57.1 ± 4.2 Na2HPO4 2.5% 1 d = 45.3 ± 15 3 d = 54.9 ± 8 7 d = 56.4 ± 3 DW 1 d = 67.2 ± 9 3 d = 70.4 ± 9.8 7 d = 57.1 ± 4.2 | The samples of MTA mixed with 5% CaCl2 and Na2HPO4 were statistically more biocompatible than the samples of MTA mixed with 10% CaCl2 |
Ghasemi, N. 2016 [10] |  |  | 20% PG |  | X |  |  |  | N = 15 | Mean (SD) MTA + DW 4 days: 35.85 (12.34) 21 days: 51.22 (18.92) MTA + PG 4 days: 4.5 (0.67) 21 days: 16 (6.78) | Addition of 20% PG reduces CS of MTA |
Zapf, A. M. 2015 [30] | 5% CaCl2 | 15% Na2HPO4 | Â | Ca(OH)2 decomposition enthalpy | 3 | Â | CaCl2 accelerated the reaction product formation | ||||
Prasad 2015 [13] | 10% CaCl2, |  |  | X | X | X |  |  | 10 | Final setting time MTA + DW = 133.10 ± 7.84 MTA + 10% CaCl2 = 25.40 ± 5.58 MTA + 15% Na2HPO4 = 31.06 ± 2.91 pH 24h MTA + DW = 12.54 ± 0.27 MTA + 10% CaCl2 = 11.22 ± 0.15 MTA + 15% Na2HPO4 = 12.77 ± 0.09 CS 1day MTA + DW = 18.40 ± 0.64 MTA + 10% CaCl2 = 10.82 ± 1.08 MTA + 15% Na2HPO4 = 12.76 ± 1.60 3day MTA + DW = 23.74 ± 1.25 MTA + 10% CaCl2 = 18.72 ± 0.65 MTA + 15% Na2HPO4 = 24.37 ± 1.06 7day MTA + DW = 36.24 ± 3.33 MTA + 10% CaCl2 = 33.37 ± 3.18 MTA + 15% Na2HPO4 = 29.32 ± 1.13 | 10% CaCl2 and 15% Na2HPO4 significantly reduced the setting time of MTA By adding 10% CaCl2 and 15% Na2HPO4 the pH maintained at a high value There was no improvement in the CS of the material |
Natu, V. P. 2015 [11] |  |  | 20%, 50% and 100% PG | X |  | X | X |  | 5 3 2 | W/PG (initial setting time) 100/0 = 18.3 ± 0.3 80/20 = 55.9 ± 0.7 50/50 = 191.0 ± 0.5 pH and Ca2+ ion release The numbers are not reported | addition of PG did not improve the chemical and physical properties of MTA |
Lee, B. N. 2014 [31] | 10% CaCl2 |  |  |  |  |  |  | MTS | 10 | 48h Relative cell viability DW: 114 ± 5 Fs: 115 ± 4 | There was no significant difference in cell viability between experimental groups |
Oloomi, K. 2013 [32] | 5% CaCl2 | 2.5% wt. Na2HPO4 |  |  | X |  |  |  | 5 | 1h DW: not set CaCl2: 15.64 ± 2.05 Na2HPO4: 19.66 ± 1.25 3h (sig) DW: 17.36 ± 3.11 CaCl2: 41.20 ± 7.08 Na2HPO4: 38.16 ± 3.85 24h DW: 44.52 ± 3.52 CaCl2: 48.02 ± 2.93 Na2HPO4: 46.26 ± 3.56 1week DW: 62.64 ± 3.28 CaCl2: 60.08 ± 3.60 Na2HPO4: 58.64 ± 5.42 | CS of original and accelerated RMTA was not significantly different after one week |
Kang, J. Y 2013 [33] | 10% CaCl2 |  |  |  |  |  | X | XTT | 6 | Ca2+ ion release in 1day MTA = 3.781 mg/dl MTA + 10% CaCl2 = 331.1 XTT 1D Fs = 70 ± 8.3 DW = 82.5 ± 6.3 4D Fs = 60 ± 8.3 DW = 85.5 ± 8.3 7D Fs = 73 ± 18.7 DW = 93 ± 5.2 | MTA mixed with 10% CaCl2 in all groups showed the lowest cell viability at every time point and released a higher amount of Ca2+ ions than the other groups |
Duarte, M. A. 2012 [8] |  |  | 20%, 50%, 80% and 100% PG | X |  | X | X |  | 10 | Initial setting time 100% DW = 15 ± 1.4 80% DW 20% = 45 ± 1.8 50% DW 50% PG = 175 ± 1.8 20% DW 80% PG = 403 ± 24.6 100% PG = not set Final setting time 100% DW = 30 ± 1.6 80% DW 20% = 85 ± 2.2 50% DW 50% PG = 385 ± 8.4 20% DW 80% PG = 661 ± 10.2 100% PG = not set pH 100% DW = 7.80 ± 0.37 80% DW 20% = 7.44 ± 0.19 50% DW 50% PG = 7.56 ± 0.05 20% DW 80% PG = 7.61 ± 0.22 100% PG = 7.61 ± 0.27 Control = 6.90 ± 0.25 Ca2+ ion release Mg/l 24h 100% DW = 3.10 ± 0.78 80% DW 20% = 4.89 ± 1.01 50% DW 50% PG = 4.40 ± 0.91 20% DW 80% PG = 4.36 ± 2.47 100% PG = 3.93 ± 1.49 Control = 0 | The addition of PG to MTA-Angelus increased ST. Also increased the pH and Ca2+ ion release during the initial and post-mixing periods |
Lee, B. N. 2011 [3] | 10% CaCl2 |  |  | X | X | X |  |  | 10 | Final setting time MTA + DW = 108.1 ± 1.6 MTA + 10% CaCl2 = 74.0 ± 0.6b CS MTA + DW 1 day = 19.86 ± 3.74 3 day = 37.06 ± 5.10 7 day = 39.08 ± 3.12 MTA + 10% CaCl2 1 day = 10.79 ± 1.88 3 day = 19.31 ± 1.93b 7 day = 35.30 ± 6.67 pH 24h MTA + DW = 12.9 ± 0.1 MTA + 10% CaCl2 = 11.5 ± 0.2 | Addition of 10% CaCl2 to MTA decreased ST Also decreased CS at all time points for 7 days, but there was no difference in the day 7 The pH of the admixture was significantly lower than the control, but maintained in high level but stable at a high level (pH 11–12) |
Jafarnia, B. 2009 [34] | 5% CaCl2 |  |  |  |  |  |  | MTT | 6 | Set MTA 1D DW: 91 ± 2 Saline: 89 ± 3 Fs: 90 ± 4 2D DW: 85 ± 4 Saline: 83 ± 5 Fs: 81 ± 7 3D DW: 83 ± 3 Saline: 81 ± 3 Fs: 84 ± 2 | The addition of 5% CaCl2 does not affect the cytotoxicity of MTA |
Bortoluzzi, E. A. 2009 [9] | 10% CaCl2 |  |  | X |  | X |  |  | 36 | Initial setting time WMTA = 12 ± 0.34 WMTA + CaCl2 = 6 ± 0.50 Final setting time WMTA = 48 ± 0.87 WMTA + CaCl2 = 31 ± 2.00 pH Immediate DW = 9.77 ± 0.18 10% CaCl2 = 10.06 ± 0.13 24h DW = 11.07 ± 0.02 10% CaCl2 = 11.29 ± 0.09 | The addition of CaCl2 to MTA reduced both the initial and final ST and significantly increased the pH of MTA in the immediate period, at 24 h, and at 72 h |
Huang, T. H. 2008 [15] |  | 15%, 10% and 5% Na2HPO4 |  | X |  | X |  |  | 3 | Final setting time DW = 151 ± 6 5% = 108 ± 5 10% = 89 ± 4 15% = 26 ± 2 pH After initial mixing = 11.0 20min = 12.0 Steady point = 13.2 | The Na2HPO4 solution may be an effective setting accelerator for MTA |
Ding, S. J. 2008 [35] |  | 15%, 10% and 5% Na2HPO4 |  | X |  | X |  | XTT | 3 | Final setting time 5% = 124 ± 12 10% = 100 ± 14 15% = 28 ± 2 DW = 228 ± 12 pH Freshly mixed = 11.0 2 h = 12.5 6 h after final setting = 13.5 XTT 1D 15% = 89 ± 11 DW = 92 ± 11 7D 15% = 94 ± 12 DW = 100 ± 13 | The ST decreased as the concentrations of Na2HPO4 increased The cell survival rate was higher than 90% |
Wiltbank, K. B. 2007 [5] | 5% CaCl2 |  |  | X |  | X |  |  | 3 | Initial setting time WMTA DW = 74.4 ± 26.1 5% CaCl2 = 35.1 ± 7.2 GMTA DW = 67.5 ± 9.9 5% CaCl2 = 33.3 ± 4.5 pH | Adding 5% CaCl2 reduced the ST but did not change the pH significantly |
Antunes Bortoluzzi, E. 2006 [36] | 10% CaCl2 |  |  |  |  | X | X |  | 3 | Ca2+ ion release Mg/dl immediate DW = 0.086 ± 0.04 10% CaCl2 = 0.13 ± 0.06 1h DW = 0.086 ± 0.05 10% CaCl2 = 0.13 ± 0.05 24h DW = 1.16 ± 0.76 10% CaCl2 = 1.85 ± 0.45 pH Immediate: DW = 9.33 ± 0.41 CaCl2 = 10 ± 0.10 1 h DW = 10.93 ± 0.38 CaCl2 = 10.73 ± 0.25 24 h DW = 11.46 ± 0.14 CaCl2 = 11.46 ± 0.30 | The addition of CaCl2 to MTA significantly increased Ca2+ ion release but did not change the pH significantly at 24h |