Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Stem cells in Dentistry: knowledge and attitude of Nigerian Dentists

  • Matthew Asizide Sede1,
  • Ochuwa Audu2 and
  • Clement Chinedu Azodo3Email author
BMC Oral Health201313:27

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-27

Received: 18 December 2012

Accepted: 7 June 2013

Published: 15 June 2013

Abstract

Background

Several controversies exist about the methods of harvesting and eventual utilization of stem cells in Medicine and Dentistry. The objective of the study was to investigate the awareness, attitude and knowledge of the use of stem cells in Dentistry among Nigerian Dentists.

Methods

This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among dentists selected from both private and public health sectors, in some of the major cities in Nigeria.

Results

The majority of the participants were ≤35 years in age, male, Pentecostal Christians, possessed a postgraduate qualification, had practiced for ≤5 years and were specialists or specializing. In this study, 153(81.0%) of the participants reported awareness about the use of stem cells in dentistry which was significantly associated with qualification and type of practice. Most of the respondents 114 (60.3%) had a poor knowledge of the use of stem cells in Dentistry. This was significantly associated with type of practice and awareness about stem cell use in dentistry but binary logistic regression showed awareness as the only determinant of knowledge. About three-quarters 142 (75.1%) of the participants exhibited positive attitude towards stem cell use. This had a positive non-significant association with knowledge and reported awareness.

Conclusion

Data from this study revealed a high level of awareness, positive attitude to and poor knowledge of the use of stem cells in Dentistry among a cross section of Nigerian Dentists.

Keywords

Stem cells Dentistry Knowledge Attitude

Background

Stem cells are cells that are capable of self-replication and differentiation into at least two different cell types[1]. The self-renewal characteristics of stem cells enables them to go through numerous cycles of cell division whilst maintaining the undifferentiated state and also the ability to proliferate and differentiate into multiple mature cell types[2]. In theory, stem cells can therefore divide without limit to replenish any other cell type and also function as part of the body’s repair system[3].

There are primarily two types of stem cells namely embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and adult stem cells (ASCs) or somatic stem cells. The embryos from which the human embryonic stem cells are derived are four to five days old - “blastocyst stage”[4] and their use is controversial due to the need to destroy an embryo to harvest them. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent and the most versatile stem cells with an unlimited capacity to proliferate and differentiate thereby facilitating their attraction as sources of stem cells[5]. However their drawback lies in the likelihood of neoplastic changes, if the proliferation and differentiation of the cells is not carefully controlled. Adult stem cells do not require embryo destruction[6] and are not subject to the ethical controversy that is associated with embryonic stem cells[7]. Although adult stem cells lack the potency of their embryonic counterparts, they have been used successfully to treat disease. In comparison with embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells possess only multipotent differentiation capacity[8]. Some documented sources of adult stem cells include umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid, bone marrow, adipose tissue, brain, teeth, skin and urine[912].

Stem cells, when directed to differentiate into specific cell types, offer the possibility of a renewable source of replacement cells and tissues to treat conditions such as spinal cord injury, stroke, heart disease, diabetes, arthritis, radiation-induced tissue damage, Parkinson and Alzheimer’s diseases[1320]. Stem cells have also shown potentials in reversing the effects of age, offering a possible ‘cure’ for aging altogether[21]. Stem cells have also been reportedly used to reverse blindness[22] and are currently being investigated for use in the treatment of graft-versus-host disease, Crohn’s and lupus, based on their ability to modulate the immune system[23, 24] and in the screening of potential anti-tumor drugs with promising data arising from animal-testing[3].

Dental Stem Cells (DSCs) derived from tooth structures are adult stem cells that have captured the attention of researchers over the past decade[5]. These stem cells are readily accessible and can be obtained and stored for future use through minimally invasive procedures[25]. Just as DSCs have the potential for use throughout the body, stem cells from extra-oral sites may be used for regenerating dental tissue[5]. Roots of teeth and periodontal ligaments have been regenerated from dental stem cells[26]. Cells from tooth buds have been differentiated into a small tooth structure and transplanted in vivo[27]. Mesenchymal stem cells from the pulp and the follicle associated with third molars are under investigation for possible dentine[28] and enamel[29] production respectively. Clinical studies have been conducted using stem cells for alveolar ridge augmentation[30, 31], reconstruction of a resected mandible[32] and generation of a human-shaped temporomandibular joint[3336].

Despite the well known potentials of stem cell research and therapies in dentistry, several controversies dog the methods of harvesting and eventual utilization of stem cells. Some European Union member states have a restrictive approach on embryonic stem cell research because of religious, cultural and historical reasons[37].

The problems with stem cell use are diverse, including, but not limited to lack of basic knowledge of stem cells, ethical and religious issues concerning their use[3741] and foremost among them is the moral concern regarding embryo destruction[3841]. Other issues include the possibility of human cloning, the potential exploitation of embryo and egg donors, as well as the questions raised by the new alternative techniques for obtaining stem cells[40].

The field of Dentistry is not spared of these controversies and knowledge dearth that envelopes the use of stem cells. A literature search revealed that there is dearth of information relating to the use knowledge of and attitude to the of stem cells in Medicine and Dentistry. A practitioner survey of opinions toward regenerative endodontics in the United States showed that 96% of participants thought more regenerative therapies should be incorporated into dental treatments, with findings which suggested that endodontists were supportive and optimistic about the future use of regenerative endodontics[42]. The objective of this study was to investigate awareness, attitude and knowledge of the use of stem cells in Dentistry among Nigerian dentists.

Methods

This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among consenting dentists from both private and public health sectors, in randomly selected major cities in the southern part of Nigeria between February and June, 2012. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. Using the Cochran (1977)[43] statistical formula, the minimum sample size was calculated, but a 10% was added to amount for non response and incomplete questionnaires giving a total of 191 but 200 dentists were finally recruited for this study.

The survey was carried out using a self-administered, anonymous, twenty nine item, structured, hand and mail-delivered questionnaire. The questionnaire was pretested amongst selected dentists before the study commenced, to identify any problem areas in the questionnaire and to make appropriate alterations, as adjudged necessary. The content validity was confirmed from an in-depth literature search and a review of different questions asked in several continuing dental education end of course assessments which were accessed on the internet. The questionnaire was divided into three broad sections:

Section A

Questions here were close-ended and dealt with socio-demographic variables, awareness and sources of information of stem cell use in Dentistry. The socio-demographic variables included age, gender, religion, field of practice, number of years in practice, designation and highest professional qualification.

Section B

Here, structured questions were used to assess the general knowledge of stem cells- their characteristics, types, potency, plasticity, general sources, dental sources and potential uses in dentistry. Two questions were included to elicit the knowledge of ethical problems surrounding stem cell use and stem cell banking respectively.

All questions in this section were close ended, with instructions to participants to select answers, as appropriate. Questions were sourced, with some modifications, from the questions asked in the end of course assessment following a continuing dental education course organized by the Academy of Dental Therapeutics and Stomatology, United States of America, in 2007[7].

Section C

This section was made up of twelve items and a four-point Likert scale (“strongly agree”, “agree”, “disagree” and “strongly disagree”) was used to assess the response of the participants as regard their attitude to the use of stem cells in Dentistry. Opinions expressed were drawn from several articles, journals and internet blogs which dealt with the controversial and sensitive issues surrounding stem cell collection, utilization and human cloning. These issues revolved around ethics, morality and the moral status of the embryo, religion, motives, trust and fear. The negative opinions were intermingled with the positive ones, to give room for a wide range of attitudes to be expressed.

Data from questionnaires were manually scored and graded, coded and finally entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 for data analysis. All data collected was subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics to generate frequencies, percentages and Chi-square values at a significance of P < 0.05. Logistic regression was also performed on the collated data to ascertain the determinant of knowledge regarding stem cells among the participants.

The knowledge section was graded in the range of zero (0) to thirty three (33), with 0–11 being poor knowledge, 12–22, being fair knowledge and 23–33 good knowledge. A total of twelve questions measured attitude to stem cell use in the questionnaire. Scoring for each question was a maximum score of four (4) and minimum score of one (1) giving a cumulative minimum score of twelve (12) and maximum score of forty-eight (48). A score of 12–30 indicated an overall negative attitude while a score of 31–48 indicated an overall positive attitude to stem cell research and therapy.

Results

The majority of the participants were 35 years old or less, male, Pentecostal Christians possessed an additional postgraduate qualification, had practiced for 5 years or less and were specialists or specializing (Table 1). About one-third of the participants were non-specialist. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Orthodontics, Restorative and Oral Pathology were the four leading fields of practice among participants that were specialist or specializing (Table 2).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the participants

Characteristics

Frequency

Percent

Age (years)

  

  ≤35

133

70.4

  >35

56

29.6

Gender

  

  Male

124

65.6

  Female

65

34.4

Religion

  

  Pentecostal Christianity

107

56.6

  Orthodox Christianity

63

33.3

  Islam

16

8.5

  Unspecified

3

1.6

Qualification

  

  Basic

55

29.1

  Additional

134

70.9

Years of experience

  

  ≤5

104

55.0

  >5

85

45.0

Type of practice

  

  Non specializing

81

42.9

  Specializing/specialist

108

57.1

Total

189

100.0

Table 2

Field of practice among the participants

Field

Frequency

Percent

Non specialist

67

35.4

Oral & maxillofacial surgery

37

19.6

Orthodontics

18

9.5

Restorative

15

7.9

Oral pathology

15

7.9

Community dentistry

11

5.8

Prosthodontics

8

4.2

Oral medicine

8

4.2

Pediatric dentistry

7

3.7

Periodontology

3

1.6

Total

189

100.0

The leading source of information regarding stem cells was conference/symposium/seminar among 67 (43.8%) of the participants while mass media 14 (9.2%) was the least source of information (Figure 1). Most of the respondents, 114 (60.3%) had poor knowledge about the use of stem cells in dentistry.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6831-13-27/MediaObjects/12903_2012_Article_289_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Sources of information regarding stem cell among the participants.

In this study, awareness about stem cell use in dentistry was reported by 153 (81.0%) of the participants. This awareness was found to be higher among older participants (aged >35 years), muslim, males participants, more experienced in terms of years of practice (>5 years), those that possessed postgraduate qualification and those participants who were specialist or specializing. However, it was only qualification (P = 0.024) and type of practice (P = 0.001) that were significantly associated with awareness about stem cell use in dentistry (Table 3).
Table 3

Awareness concerning stem cell use in dentistry among the participants

Awareness

 

Yes

No

P-value

 

n (%)

n (%)

 

Characteristics

   

Age (years)

  

0.787

  ≤35

107 (80.5)

26 (19.5)

 

  >35

46 (82.1)

10 (17.9)

 

Gender

  

0.072

  Male

105 (84.7)

19 (15.3)

 

  Female

48 (73.8)

17 (26.2)

 

Religion

  

0.625

  Pentecostal Christianity

84 (78.5)

23 (21.5)

 

  Orthodox Christianity

52 (82.5)

11 (17.5)

 

  Islam

14 (87.5)

2 (12.5)

 

Years of practice

  

0.119

  ≤5

80 (76.9)

24 (23.1)

 

  >5

73 (85.9)

12 (14.1)

 

Qualification

  

0.024

  Basic

39 (70.9)

16 (29.1)

 

  Additional

114 (85.1)

20 (14.9)

 

Type of practice

  

0.001

  Non specializing

57 (70.4)

24 (29.6)

 

  Specializing/specialist

96 (88.9)

12 (11.1)

 
The knowledge about the use of stem cells in dentistry was higher among the older (aged >35 years), muslim, female participants, who were more experienced in terms of years of practice (>5 years). Those who possessed a postgraduate qualification and were specialists or in the process of specializing, reported awareness about the use of stem cells in dentistry and expressed positive attitudes towards the use of stem cells. However, it was the type of practice (P = 0.030) and awareness about the use of stem cells in dentistry (P = 0.002) that were significantly associated with knowledge of the use of stem cells (Table 4).
Table 4

Knowledge about stem cell among the participants

Knowledge

 

Good/fair

Poor

P-value

 

n (%)

n (%)

 

Characteristics

   

Age (years)

  

0.060

  ≤35

47 (35.3)

86 (64.7)

 

  >35

28 (50.0)

28 (50.0)

 

Gender

  

0.949

  Male

49 (39.5)

75 (60.5)

 

  Female

26 (40.0)

39 (60.0)

 

Religion

  

0.710

  Pentecostal Christianity

42 (39.3)

65 (60.7)

 

  Orthodox Christianity

25 (39.7)

38 (60.3)

 

  Islam

8 (50.0)

8 (50.0)

 

Qualification

  

0.211

  Basic

18 (32.7)

37 (67.3)

 

  Additional

57 (42.5)

77 (57.5)

 

Years of practice

  

0.030

  ≤5

34 (32.7)

70 (67.3)

 

  >5

41 (48.2)

44 (51.8)

 

Type of practice

  

0.122

  Non specializing

27 (33.3)

54 (66.7)

 

  Specializing/specialist

48 (44.4)

60 (55.6)

 

Awareness of stem cell use in dentistry

  

0.002

  Yes

69 (45.1)

84 (54.9)

 

  No

6 (16.7)

30 (83.3)

 

Attitude towards stem cell use

  

0.823

  Positive

57 (40.1)

85 (59.9)

 

  Negative

18 (38.3)

29 (61.7)

 
Logistic regression showed that awareness was the only determinant of knowledge about the use of stem cells. The participants who reported awareness about use of stem cells in dentistry had more knowledge about stem cell use (P = 0.003) (Table 5). About three-quarters-142 (75.1%) of the participants exhibited a positive attitude towards stem cell use. There was a non significant association between attitude towards the use of stem cells with age, gender, religion, years of practice, qualification, type of practice and awareness about the use of stem cells in dentistry (Table 6).
Table 5

Determinants of knowledge about stem cell among the participants

Characteristics

O.D

95% C.I

P-value

Age (years)

   

  ≤35

1

-

-

  >35

0.657

0.289-1.496

0.317

Gender

   

  Male

1

-

-

  Female

0.852

0.442-1.643

0.633

Religion

   

  Islam

1

-

-

  Pentecostal Christianity

0.750

0.235- 2.394

0.627

  Orthodox Christianity

0.941

0.482-1.837

0.858

Qualification

   

  Basic

1

-

-

  Additional

0.866

0.370-2.162

0.757

Years of practice

   

  ≤5

1

-

-

  >5

0.713

0.347-1.683

0.440

Type of practice

   

  Non specializing

1

-

-

  Specializing/specialist

1.122

0.448-2.808

0.806

Awareness about stem cell use in dentistry

  

  No

1

-

-

  Yes

0.235

0.089-0.617

0.003

Table 6

Attitude towards stem cell application among the participants

Attitude

 

Positive

Negative

P-value

 

n (%)

n (%)

 

Characteristics

   

Age (years)

  

0.478

   ≤35

98 (73.7)

35 (26.3)

 

   >35

44 (78.6)

12 (21.4)

 

Gender

  

0.315

   Male

96 (77.4)

28 (22.6)

 

   Female

46 (70.8)

19 (29.2)

 

Religion

  

0.904

   Pentecostal Christianity

80 (74.8)

27 (25.2)

 

   Orthodox Christianity

49 (77.8)

14 (22.2)

 

   Islam

12 (75.0)

4 (25.0)

 

Years of practice

  

0.191

   ≤5

82 (78.8)

22 (21.2)

 

   >5

60 (70.6)

25 (29.4)

 

Qualification

  

0.083

   Basic

46 (83.6)

9 (16.4)

 

   Additional

96 (71.6)

38 (28.4)

 

Type of practice

  

0.159

   Non specializing

65 (80.2)

16 (19.8)

 

   Specializing/specialist

77 (71.3)

31 (28.7)

 

Awareness

  

0.192

   Yes

118 (77.1)

35 (22.9)

 

   No

24 (66.7)

12 (33.3)

 

Discussion

In this study, the majority of the participants were aged 35 years or less, male, Pentecostal Christians, possessed additional postgraduate qualification(s), had practiced for 5 years or less and were specialist or specializing which reflected the dominant status of actively practicing dentists in the major cities in the Southern part of Nigeria. The increased specialist training opportunity due to the opening of new dental schools and the improvement in the remuneration of specializing doctors in Nigeria in recent times may have been the attraction thereby increasing the number of dental specialists or specializing dentists reported in this study. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery was the leading field of practice among participants that are specialist or specializing. The leading specialty reported in this study is in tandem with findings of studies on career choices among Nigerian dental students[44].

In Dentistry, stem cells have the potential of providing permanent cures for all lesions of pulpal or periodontal origins. Congenital and acquired intra and extra-oral soft and hard tissue defects could also be effectively managed or treated with stem-cell based approaches and future tooth replacements in the form of ‘ a new natural tooth’ now seem like a possibility.

In this study, awareness of the use of stem cells in dentistry was reported by 153 (81.0%) of the participants. This awareness about the use of stem cells in dentistry was higher among the older muslim and male participants (aged >35 years), who were more experienced in terms of years of practice (>5 years), those that possessed a postgraduate qualification and those participants who were specialist or in the process of specializing. However it was essentially qualification and type of practice that were significantly associated with awareness about stem cell use in dentistry. These findings can be explained by the fact that conference/symposium/seminar, postgraduate training, internet and journals (the leading sources of information regarding stem cells among the participants) are the dominant mode of learning among those participants who are specialist or specializing and had an additional postgraduate qualification. The low contribution of undergraduate training to awareness explained why awareness about stem cell use in dentistry was higher among older participants (aged >35 years) and participants more experienced in terms of years of practice (>5 years). The higher awareness about use of stem cells in dentistry among males may be explained in two folds. Firstly, it may be due to the dominance of males in postgraduate training. Secondly, the greater information seeking ability characteristics of males due to their attribution of success to external causes in comparison to females leads to their conference/symposium/seminar attendance[45].

An overall good/fair knowledge about the stem cells in the study was noted among 75 (39.7%) of the participants. This overall good/fair knowledge about the use of stem cells was significantly higher among specialist or those specializing and participants that reported awareness about use of stem cell in dentistry; a binary logistic regression showed that awareness was the only determinant of knowledge about the use of stem cells. The positive effects of awareness about issues on knowledge have been consistently reported[46] thereby explaining the effect of awareness on knowledge in this study as variables on higher awareness except for gender were same for knowledge about stem cells. Gender differences were found to be in the knowledge distribution, with females having more fair/good knowledge about stem cells despite lower awareness of the use of stem cells in dentistry may be linked with the fact that female dentists have higher tendencies to accept and pay more attention to details in new trends while males are more likely to resist them thereby lessening their overall knowledge. The reported male preference for rational evaluation and logical learning style compared to female elaborative processing learning style may be a contributory explanation[47].

In this study, three-quarters 142 (75.1%) of the participants exhibited a positive attitude towards stem cell use. Similarly, a recent study[48] among a group of dental residents in the United States of America revealed considerable support for stem use in dentistry though with some reservation about the possible health hazards. This high level of positive attitude can be explained by the high level of awareness about stem cell noted in this study. This is based on the fact that expressed positive attitude to stem cell had a positive non-significant association with knowledge about stem cell and reported awareness about stem cell use in dentistry.

Religious reservations concerning stem cell use have been documented in the literature[37, 40, 41]. However, religion was not a stable and significant factor in this study because a more positive attitude towards stem cell was found among orthodox Christians meanwhile a non-statistically significant higher awareness and an overall fair/good knowledge was found among Muslim participants. The high awareness, poor knowledge and positive attitude towards stem cell use may be responsible for this finding. The handling of religious issues with care among professionals in comparison with the general public may be contributory.

Conclusion

Data from this study revealed a high level of awareness, positive attitude to and poor knowledge of the use of stem cells in Dentistry among a cross section of Nigerian Dentists. Awareness about the use of stem cells in dentistry was a significant determinant of knowledge about the use of stem cells in this study. The improvement of knowledge about the use of stem cells in dentistry is achievable through heightened awareness creation on the issue. It can also be concluded that the use of stem cells in dentistry is acceptable to Nigerian Dentists.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Benin
(2)
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Benin Teaching Hospital
(3)
Department of Periodontics, New Dental Complex, University of Benin Teaching Hospital

References

  1. Mao JJ: Stem cells and the future of dental care. NY State Dent J. 2008, 74 (2): 20-24.Google Scholar
  2. Friedlander LT, Cullinan MP, Love RM: Dental stem cells and their potential role in apexogenesis and apexification. Int Endod J. 2009, 42: 955-962. 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01622.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. National Institute of Health Resource for Stem Cell Research. http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/pages/basics1.aspx. Accessed on 8/8/2012
  4. Sandhu SS, Nair M: Stem cells: potential implications for tooth regeneration and tissue engineering in dental science. People J Sci Res. 2009, 2 (1): 41-45.Google Scholar
  5. Majeski J: Dental stem cells in research and practice. Access. 2009, 26: 24-26.Google Scholar
  6. Schneegans: Teeth will help to shape the future of stem cell research. World Sci. 2008, 6 (3): 16-17.Google Scholar
  7. Mao JJ, Collins FM: Stem cells: Sources, therapies and the dental professional. http://www.ineedce.com/courses/1486/PDF/StemCells.pdf. Accessed on 8/7/2012
  8. Lin NH, Gronthos S, Bartold PM: Stem cells and periodontal regeneration. Aust Dent J. 2008, 53: 108-121. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00019.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S: Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 13625-13630. 10.1073/pnas.240309797.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR: Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. 1999, 284: 143-147. 10.1126/science.284.5411.143.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Avasthi A: Human Skin Cells Given Stem Cell Properties. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/11/071120-stem-cells.html. Accessed on 10/7/2012
  12. Bharadwaj S, Liu G, Shi Y, Markert C, Andersson KE, Atala A, Zhang Y: Characterization of urine-derived stem cells obtained from upper urinary tract for use in cell-based urological tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011, 17 (15-16): 2123-32. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Perrier AL, Tabar V, Barberi T, Rubio ME, Bruses J, Topf N, Harrison NL, Studer L: Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (34): 125434-125438.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Neural stem cells offer potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Available from:http://phys.org/news167330309.html. Accessed on 07/08/2012,
  15. Nosrat IV, Widenfalk J, Olson L, Nosrat CA: Dental pulp cells produce neurotrophic factors, interact with trigeminal neurons in vitro, and rescue motorneurons after spinal cord injury. Dev Biol. 2001, 238: 120-132. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chopp M, Li Y: Treatment of neural injury with marrow stromal cells. Lancet Neurol. 2002, 1: 92-100. 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00040-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heng BC, Haider HK, Sim EK, Cao T, Ng SC: Strategies for directing the differentiation of stem cells into cardiomyogenic lineage in vitro. Cardiovasc Res. 2004, 62: 34-42. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.12.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosa SB, Voltarelli JC, Chies JA, Pranke P: The use of stem cells for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007, 40: 1579-1597. 10.1590/S0100-879X2006005000166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Burt RK, Oyama Y, Verda L, Quigley K, Brush M, Yaung K, Statkute L, Traynor A, Barr WG: Induction of remission of severe and refractory rheumatoid arthritis by allogeneic mixed chimerism. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50: 2466-2470. 10.1002/art.20451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mouiseddine M, François S, Semont A, Sache A, Allenet B, Mathieu N, Frick J, Thierry D, Chapel A: Human mesenchymal stem cells home specifically to radiation-injured tissues in a non-obese diabetes/severe combined immunodeficiency mouse model. Br J Radiol. 2007, 80 (1): S49-S55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pillai P: Advantages and Disadvantages of Stem Cell. Avaiable from:http://www.buzzle.com/articles/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-stem-cell-research.html. Accessed 12/8/2012,
  22. Corradini F, Venturi B, Pellegrini G, De Luca M: Methods for characterization/manipulation of human corneal stem cells and their applications in regenerative medicine. Methods Mol Biol. 2012, 916: 357-372. 10.1007/978-1-61779-980-8_26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Barry FP, Murphy JM: Mesenchymal stem cells: clinical applications and biological characterization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004, 36 (4): 568-584. 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith-Berdan S, Gille D, Weissman IL, Christensen JL: Reversal of autoimmune disease in lupus-prone New Zealand black/New Zealand white mice by non-myeloablative transplantation of purified allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2007, 110 (4): 1370-1378. 10.1182/blood-2007-03-081497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Freund BG: D-Stem Cells and Dentistry: answers to seven questions. Available from:http://www.dentistryiq.com/articles/2011/07/stem-cells-and-dentistry-answers-to-seven-questions.html. Accessed 12/8/2012,
  26. Shi S, Chai Y, Slavkin H: Emerging opportunities for the next generation of dental implants?. Dent Today. 2009, 28 (3): 98-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Duailibi MT, Duailibi SE, Young CS, Bartlett JD, Vacanti JP, Yelick PC: Bioengineered teeth from cultured rat tooth bud cells. J Dent Res. 2004, 83 (7): 523-528. 10.1177/154405910408300703.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Iohara K, Nakashima M, Ito M, Ishikawa M, Nakasima A, Akamire A: Dentin regeneration by dental pulp stem cell therapy with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2. J Dent Res. 2004, 83 (8): 590-595. 10.1177/154405910408300802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Young CS, Terada S, Vacanti JP, Honda M, Bartlett JD: Tissue engineering of complex tooth structures on biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Dent. 2002, 81 (10): 695-700.Google Scholar
  30. Ueda M, Yamada Y, Ozawa R, Okazaki Y: Clinical case reports of injectable tissue-engineered bone for alveolar augmentation with simultaneous implant placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005, 25 (2): 129-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hibi H, Yamada Y, Ueda M, Endo Y: Alveolar cleft osteoplasty using tissue-engineered osteogenic material. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg. 2006, 35: 551-555. 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.12.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mankani MH, Krebsbach PH, Satomura K, Kuznetsov SA, Hoyt R, Robey PG: Pedicled bone flap formation using transplanted bone marrow stromal cells. Arch Surg. 2001, 136: 263-270. 10.1001/archsurg.136.3.263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marion NW, Mao JJ: Mesenchymal stem cells and tissue engineering. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 420: 339-361.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Troken A, Marion N, Hollister S, Mao J: Tissue engineering of the synovial joint: the role of cell density. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2007, 221 (5): 429-440. 10.1243/09544119JEIM288.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Alhadlaq A, Mao JJ: Tissue-engineered neogenesis of human-shaped mandibular condyle from rat mesenchymal stem cells. J Dent Res. 2003, 82 (12): 951-956. 10.1177/154405910308201203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Alhadlaq A, Mao JJ: Tissue engineered osteochondral constructs in the shape of an articular condyle. J Bone Jt Surg AM. 2005, 87: 936-944. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Rare Disease Patients’ Perspective on Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Therapy. September, 2006. Available from:http://www.eurordis.org/publication/embryonic-stem-cell-research-and-therapy. Accessed on 28/7/2012.,
  38. Ali KH, Williams DL, Jackson P, Pau HP: Attitudes of the UK ear, nose and throat clinical community to the future potential use of stem cell therapies to treat deafness. Regen Med. 2012, 7 (2): 179-186. 10.2217/rme.11.124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Witherspoon Council on Ethics and the Integrity of Science: Ethical considerations regarding stem cell research. The New Atlantis. 2012, 1 (34): 98-113.Google Scholar
  40. Lo B, Parham L: Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research. Endocr Rev. 2009, 30 (3): 204-213. 10.1210/er.2008-0031.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Tompkins A, Thomson J: Stem Cell Research- Clinical Decision Making. http://www.qualitylifemassage.com/userfiles/Ethics-Stem%20Cell%20Research%281%29.pdf. Accessed on 15/8/2012
  42. Epelman I, Murray PE, Garcia-Godoy F, Kuttler S, Namerow KN: A practitioner survey of opinions toward regenerative endodontics. J Endod. 2009, 9: 1204-1210.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Cochran WG: Sampling Techniques. 1977, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 190-205. 3Google Scholar
  44. Orenuga OO, Dacosta OO: A survey and career aspirations of clinical dental students in Nigerian Universities. Nig Dent J. 2009, 17 (1): 19-23.Google Scholar
  45. Grollino E, Velayo RS: Gender differences in the attribution of internal success among college students. 1996, Philadelphia, PA: Annual Convention of the Eastern Psychological Association, 1-12.Google Scholar
  46. Prue CE, Hammer HC, Flores AL: Effects of folic acid awareness on knowledge and consumption for the prevention of birth defects among Hispanic women in several U.S Communities. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010, 19 (4): 689-89. 10.1089/jwh.2009.1573.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Lie LY, Angelique L, Cheong E: How do male and female students approach learning at NUS?. CDTL Brief. 2004, 7: 1-3.Google Scholar
  48. Manguno C, Murray PE, Howard C, Madras J, Mangan S, Namerow KN: A survey of dental residents' expectations for regenerative endodontics. J Endod. 2012, 38 (2): 137-143. 10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/13/27/prepub

Copyright

© Sede et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.