Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A comparison of photographic, replication and direct clinical examination methods for detecting developmental defects of enamel

Original Submission
2 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jack Toumba
29 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Najat Farsi
10 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vita Machiulskiene
22 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Armando Soto-Rojas
8 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ali Golkari
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vita Machiulskiene
18 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ali Golkari
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ali Golkari
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Apr 2011 Editorially accepted
21 Apr 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6831-11-16

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page