Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Tachezy |
8 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aimee Kreimer |
10 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Germano Orrù |
22 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - tarik gheit |
20 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Karl Kingsley |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Tachezy |
20 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aimee Kreimer |
21 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - tarik gheit |
23 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Germano Orrù |
25 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Karl Kingsley |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Karl Kingsley |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
10 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6831-11-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.