Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
4 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Binnaz Leblebicioglu |
6 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Papaioannou |
7 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ryota Nomura |
7 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Karl Kingsley |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
7 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
2 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Papaioannou |
2 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ryota Nomura |
9 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Binnaz Leblebicioglu |
13 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Karl Kingsley |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
13 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
30 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Karl Kingsley |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
30 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
1 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6831-12-34 |
You can find further information about peer review here.