Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathryn DeLaughter |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Aveyard |
7 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - BA Finegan |
8 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kota Katanoda |
7 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathryn DeLaughter |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathryn DeLaughter |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
16 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Aveyard |
26 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - BA Finegan |
29 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kota Katanoda |
30 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathryn DeLaughter |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
25 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathryn DeLaughter |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
25 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
9 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Aveyard |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Publishing | ||
11 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6831-13-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.