Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes

Original Submission
25 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - NEWTON SESMA
15 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alvin Wee
7 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Emir Yuzbasioglu
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Emir Yuzbasioglu
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alvin Wee
21 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Emir Yuzbasioglu
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
30 Jan 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6831-14-10

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page