Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution of dentists' responses to case scenario

From: Care coordination among pediatricians and dentists: a cross-sectional study of opinions of North Carolina dentists

Case description. An 18 month old child receives a caries risk assessment and screening by a pediatrician and was found to have no dental decay or oral pathology. No behavioral or clinical caries risk factors are reported. Based on your determination of the child's risk assessment above, how should the pediatrician address the child's oral health needs?

All (N = 376)

General dentists who treat infants and toddlers (N = 276)

Pediatric dentists (N = 100)

Adequate workforce

N

%

N

%

N

%

Refer the child to a dentist now

195

51.9

111

40.2

84

84

Wait and refer the child at 3 years of age, but continue dental screenings during well-child visits

121

32.2

115

41.7

6

6

Wait and refer the child at 3 years of age, but provide counseling and fluoride varnish during medical visits

49

13

42

15.2

7

7

Not sure

1

0.3

1

0.4

0

0

Other

10

2.6

7

2.5

3

3

Limited workforce

      

Refer the child to a dentist now

127

33.8

74

26.1

55

55

Wait and refer the child at 3 years of age, but continue dental screenings during well-child visits

139

36.9

121

43.8

18

18

Wait and refer the child at 3 years of age, but provide counseling and fluoride varnish during medical visits

97

25.8

73

26.5

24

24

Not sure

3

0.8

2

0.7

1

1

Other

10

2.7

8

2.9

2

2

  1. The results of chi-squared tests indicate that dentists’ response to the 3-group categorical case scenario differed significantly for general and pediatric dentists. (adequate workforce:χ 2 = 60.0, p < 0.000; limited workforce:χ 2 = 31.5 p < 0.000).