Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the baseline factors between the two groups

From: Glass ionomer ART sealant and fluoride-releasing resin sealant in fissure caries prevention – results from a randomized clinical trial

Factors

Group

p-value*

 

Resin sealant

ART sealant

 

Participant

   

#Age (SD)

7.8 (0.66)

7.8 (0.66)

0.695

Gender

  

0.881

-Boy

70 (44.6%)

70 (43.8%)

 

-Girl

87 (55.4%)

90 (56.2%)

 

Snacking habit

  

0.152

-Once a day or less

116 (73.9%)

129 (80.6%)

 

-Twice or more a day

41 (26.1%)

31 (19.4%)

 

Tooth brushing habit

  

0.901

-Once a day or less

56 (35.7%)

56 (35.0%)

 

-Twice or more a day

101 (64.3%)

104 (65.0%)

 

Group allocation combination

  

0.942

-Sealant/sealant

40 (25.5%)

40 (25.0%)

 

-Sealant/SDF

62 (39.5%)

61 (38.1%)

 

-Sealant/NaFΦ

55 (35.0%)

59 (36.9%)

 

Molar

   

Group allocation combination

  

0.624

-Sealant/sealant

47 (24.9%)

45 (23.2%)

 

-Sealant/SDF

77 (40.7%)

73 (37.6%)

 

-Sealant/NaF

65 (34.4%)

76 (39.2%)

 

Baseline molar status

  

0.047

-Sound with deep fissure

166 (87.8%)

156 (80.4%)

 

-Present with incipient caries

23 (12.2%)

38 (19.6%)

 

Location

  

0.964

-Upper molar

53 (28.0%)

54 (27.8%)

 

-Lower molar

136 (72.0%)

140 (72.2%)

 

DIAGNOdent reading

  

0.543

-0 ~ 15

77 (40.7%)

85 (43.8%)

 

-16 ~ 39

112 (59.3%)

109 (56.2%)

 
  1. Comparisons were performed by using Chi-square test otherwise specified while respective percentage was reported in the parenthesis. #Independent samples t-test was performed for the comparison while standard deviation (SD) of the respective data was reported in the parenthesis. Silver diammine fluoride solution. ΦSodium fluoride varnish. *Statistical significance level is set at 0.05 and value of statistical significance is emphasized in bold.