Skip to main content

Table 3 Longitudinal validity: mean change OIDP scores (sd) and [effect sizes] by change scores of reference variables (Norwegian cohort n = 2947) (Swedish cohort n = 4862)

From: Change in Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) with increasing age: testing the evaluative properties of the OIDP frequency inventory using prospective data from Norway and Sweden

 

Satisfaction with oral health

 

Worseneda

Stableb

Improvedc

Total

Norway

    

OIDP change score

−1.60 (5.2) [0.4]

0.02 (2.3)[0.0]

1.28 (4.3)[0.2]**

0.04 (3.3) [0.1]

Sweden

    

OIDP change score

−0.56 (4.1) [0.2]

0.28 (2.7) [0.1]

2.14 (5.4) [0.4]**

0.49 (3.6) [0.1]

 

Satisfaction with tooth appearance

 

Worsened a

Stable b

Improved c

Total

Norway

    

OIDP change score

−1.93 (5.4) [0.5]

0.03 (2.5)[0.0]

1.41 (3.9)[0.3]**

-

Sweden

    

OIDP change score

−0.59 (4.0)[0.2]

0.34 (2.9)[0.1]

1.88 (5.3) [0.3]**

-

 

Tooth loss

 

Lost teeth a

Stable all teeth b

Stable tooth loss c

Total

Norway

    

OIDP change score

−0.72 (4.6)[0.4]

0.01 (2.0)[0.0]

0.21 (6.1)[0.3]*

-

Sweden

   

-

OIDP change score

−0.14 (3.9) [0.4]

0.25 (2.1)[0.1]

1.13 (6.4) [0.2]**

-

  1. Data are given as mean (sd) [effect size].
  2. One-way ANOVA: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.
  3. Bonferroni post hoc analyses indicated the following (p < 0.05):
  4. Statistically significant differences in mean OIDP change by change score of satisfaction with oral health and change score of satisfaction with tooth appearance in Norway and Sweden: group a vs. group b, group a vs. group c and group b vs. group c.
  5. Statistically significant differences in mean OIDP change by change score of tooth loss in Norway: group a vs. group b, group a vs. group c.
  6. Statistically significant differences in mean OIDP change by change score of tooth loss in Sweden: group a vs. group c and group b vs. group c.