Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison between two methods of working length determination and its effect on radiographic extent of root canal filling: a clinical study [ISRCTN71486641]

Original Submission
5 Mar 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
18 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose C de la Macorra
31 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashraf Fouad
17 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - Leena Smadi
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Sep 2005 Author responded Author comments - Leena Smadi
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Sep 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Sep 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose C de la Macorra
18 Sep 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashraf Fouad
31 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - Leena Smadi
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jose C de la Macorra
29 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Leena Smadi
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Leena Smadi
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
11 Feb 2006 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6831-6-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page