Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multiple regression models for quality of life of alcohol and drug users

From: The impact of oral health conditions, socioeconomic status and use of specific substances on quality of life of addicted persons

 

Quality of life

   
 

Low*

High

Crude analysis

Multiple analysis

Variables

N

%

N

%

Crude OR

CI 95%

p-value

Adjusted OR

IC95%

p-value

Sex

Male

101

38.55

110

52.13

0.64

0.34-1.19

0.160

   

Female

30

58.82

21

41.18

Ref

     

Age

≤37 years

64

46.38

74

53.62

0.73

0.45-1.19

0.215

   

>37 years

67

54.03

57

45.97

Ref

     

Race

Black

51

46.36

59

53.64

0.77

0.47-1.27

0.316

   

White

80

52.63

72

52.63

Ref

     

DMFT

          

≤13

62

43.36

81

56.64

Ref

  

Ref

  

>13

69

57.98

50

42.02

1.80

1.11-3.03

0.018

2.25

1.30-3.89

0.003

Alcohol use risk

Low

24

48.00

26

52

0.90

0.48-1.67

0.750

   

Moderate/high

107

50.47

105

49.53

Ref

     

Marijuana use risk

          

Low

69

49.29

71

50.71

0.94

0.57-1.52

0.800

   

Moderate/high

62

50.82

60

49.18

Ref

     

Cocaine/crack use

          

Low

46

44.23

58

55.77

Ref

  

Ref

  

Moderate/high

85

53.8

73

46.2

1.47

0.89-2.44

0.120

2.02

1.15-3.59

0.014

Income

≤1 MW

32

68.09

15

31.91

2.49

1.27-4.88

0.006

2.41

1.22-4.77

0.011

>1 MW

99

46.05

116

53.95

Ref

  

Ref

  

Subject education

≤8 years

86

53.75

74

46.25

1.47

0.88-2.46

0.138

   

>8 years

41

44.09

52

55.91

Ref

     

Mother’s education

≤8 years

105

50.48

103

49.52

1.93

0.85-4.36

0.106

   

>8 years

10

34.48

19

65.52

Ref

     

Father’s education

≤8 years

84

50.00

84

50.00

1.66

0.76-3.60

0.194

   

>8 years

12

37.50

20

62.5

Ref

     
  1. *Low quality of life was considered the level of reference of the dependent variable.
  2. CI = confidence interval; Odds ratio; MW = minimum wage.