Skip to main content

Table 3 The categories of risk of bias randomized clinical trials

From: Canine retraction and anchorage loss self-ligating versus conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Randomization described

Allocation concealment reported

Intent to treat analysis performed

Blinded assessment stated

A priori power calculation performed

Total points

Risk of bias

Monini [9]

1

0

0.5

0.5

1

3

Low

Mezomo [3]

1

1

0

0.5

0

2.5

Moderate

Cohort studies

Study

Representative sample of adequate size

Well matched sample

Adjusting for confounders

Blinded assessment stated

Reporting drop-outs

Total points

Risk of bias

Burrow [5]

1

1

0.5

0

0

2.5

Moderate

de Almeida [8]

1

1

0.5

0

0

2.5

Moderate

Machibya [7]

1

1

0.5

0

0

2.5

Moderate

Oz 2012 [4]

0.5

1

0.5

0

0

2

Moderate

  1. Quality assessment: 1, criterion met; 0.5, criterion partially met; 0, criterion not met or not stated
  2. Risk of bias: low, >4 points; moderate, 2-3.5 points; high, <2 points