Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature

Original Submission
10 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2015 Author responded Author comments - Edwin Kagereki
24 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Robinson
25 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mario Vettore
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Oct 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Edwin Kagereki
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Edwin Kagereki
23 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mario Vettore
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Edwin Kagereki
15 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Robinson
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Edwin Kagereki
18 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Robinson
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
5 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12903-016-0208-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page