Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluating the difference in mean A-ECOHIS scores by oral health status rating category

From: Validation of the Arabic Version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS)

Global health rating question response

Child impact section

Family impact section

Overall scale

n

Mean (SD)

ra

P-value

n

Mean (SD)

rb

P-value

n

mean (SD)

rc

P-value

Correlations

 Excellent

147

2.85 (3.3)

0.54

--

146

1.05 (1.8)

0.50

<0.01

146

3.87 (4.1)

0.55

--

 Very good

144

4.96 (3.7)

140

2.63 (2.6)

140

7.56 (5.2)

 Good

57

8.04 (4.9)

57

4.56 (3.6)

57

12.60 (7.6)

 Fair

43

8.92 (4.7)

31

3.39 (2.5)

31

10.85 (5.5)

 Poor

22

12.62 (5.5)

21

6.21 (2.6)

21

19.14 (6.8)

Differences in mean scores

 Good oral health

348

4.57 (4.1)

--

<0.01

343

2.28 (2.8)

--

<0.01

343

6.83 (6.1)

--

<0.01

 Poor oral health

65

10.17 (5.2)

  

52

4.53 (2.9)

  

52

14.20 (7.3)

  
  1. A-ECOHIS Arabic version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale
  2. Excluded from this analysis were 27 subjects who had > 1 missing item on the family section (n = 18), missing information on the global question (n = 7), and missing both > 1 item on family section and information on the global question (n = 2). Spearman correlation coefficients between achild impact section score and the global question, bfamily impact section score and the global question, and ctotal A-ECOHIS score and the global question