Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between change in employment status and tooth loss

From: Temporary employment and tooth loss: a cross-sectional study from the J-SHINE study

 

Changes in employment status

Continuous regular employment

Having the experience of temporary employment

Regular to temporary employment

Temporary to regular employment

Continuous temporary employment

Negative binomial regression models

Reference

PRR (95%CI)

PRR (95%CI)

PRR (95%CI)

PRR (95%CI)

Men (n=1,394)

(n=1,192)

(n=202)

(n=65)

(n=54)

(n=83)

Model 1

1.00

1.55 (1.18, 2.04)

1.71 (1.11, 2.63)

1.69 (1.05, 2.73)

1.31 (0.86, 2.01)

Model 2

1.00

1.50 (1.13, 2.00)

1.62 (1.05, 2.52)

1.62 (0.99, 2.64)

1.30 (0.83, 2.02)

Model 3

1.00

1.44 (1.07, 1.93)

1.51 (0.96, 2.37)

1.63 (1.00, 2.65)

1.22 (0.77, 1.92)

Model 4

1.00

1.38 (1.03, 1.85)

1.44 (0.91, 2.26)

1.53 (0.94, 2.50)

1.20 (0.76, 1.88)

Model 5

1.00

1.32 (0.98, 1.78)

1.37 (0.87, 2.16)

1.46 (0.89, 2.39)

1.16 (0.74, 1.82)

Model 6

1.00

1.31 (0.98, 1.76)

1.41 (0.90, 2.21)

1.43 (0.88, 2.33)

1.13 (0.72, 1.77)

Women (n=1,258)

(n=487)

(n=771)

(n=517)

(n=55)

(n=199)

Model 1

1.00

1.44 (1.16, 1.79)

1.34 (1.06, 1.70)

1.33 (0.79, 2.24)

1.73 (1.28, 2.34)

Model 2

1.00

1.42 (1.14, 1.76)

1.35 (1.07, 1.72)

1.30 (0.77, 2.18)

1.62 (1.19, 2.19)

Model 3

1.00

1.37 (1.10, 1.71)

1.31 (1.02, 1.66)

1.31 (0.78, 2.20)

1.56 (1.14, 2.12)

Model 4

1.00

1.38 (1.11, 1.72)

1.32 (1.03, 1.68)

1.29 (0.76, 2.19)

1.58 (1.16, 2.15)

Model 5

1.00

1.37 (1.09, 1.71)

1.32 (1.03, 1.70)

1.27 (0.75, 2.17)

1.51 (1.10, 2.06)

Model 6

1.00

1.33 (1.06, 1.66)

1.31 (1.02, 1.68)

1.14 (0.67, 1.94)

1.44 (1.06, 1.97)

Linear regression models

Reference

Coefficient (95%CI)

Coefficient (95%CI)

Coefficient (95%CI)

Coefficient (95%CI)

Men (n=1,394)

(n=1,192)

(n=202)

(n=65)

(n=54)

(n=83)

Model 1

-

0.38 (0.14, 0.62)

0.51 (0.12, 0.91)

0.47 (0.04, 0.90)

0.21 (-0.15, 0.57)

Model 2

-

0.37 (0.12, 0.62)

0.46 (0.06, 0.85)

0.42 (-0.01, 0.85)

0.25 (-0.12, 0.62)

Model 3

-

0.34 (0.09, 0.59)

0.41 (0.01, 0.81)

0.42 (-0.02, 0.85)

0.22 (-0.16, 0.59)

Model 4

-

0.32 (0.07, 0.57)

0.38 (-0.02, 0.78)

0.38 (-0.05, 0.81)

0.23 (-0.15, 0.60)

Model 5

-

0.28 (0.02, 0.53)

0.33 (-0.07, 0.74)

0.31 (-0.12, 0.74)

0.20 (-0.18, 0.58)

Model 6

-

0.25 (0.00, 0.50)

0.31 (-0.09, 0.71)

0.29 (-0.15, 0.72)

0.17 (-0.20, 0.55)

Women (n=1,258)

(n=487)

(n=771)

(n=517)

(n=55)

(n=199)

Model 1

-

0.25 (0.08, 0.41)

0.19 (0.00, 0.38)

0.25 (-0.16, 0.65)

0.36 (0.13, 0.60)

Model 2

-

0.23 (0.06, 0.40)

0.20 (0.00, 0.39)

0.25 (-0.15, 0.65)

0.31 (0.07, 0.54)

Model 3

-

0.20 (0.03, 0.38)

0.17 (-0.03, 0.36)

0.24 (-0.16, 0.64)

0.27 (0.02, 0.51)

Model 4

-

0.21 (0.04, 0.39)

0.17 (-0.02, 0.37)

0.24 (-0.16, 0.65)

0.28 (0.04, 0.53)

Model 5

-

0.20 (0.02, 0.38)

0.16 (-0.04, 0.36)

0.25 (-0.15, 0.65)

0.26 (0.01, 0.51)

Model 6

-

0.16 (-0.02, 0.33)

0.13 (-0.06, 0.33)

0.11 (-0.29, 0.51)

0.22 (-0.03, 0.46)

  1. Model 1: Age was adjusted
  2. Model 2: Model 1 + years of education, self-rated household economic status in early life at 5 years old, marital status, no. of family members in the household, history of diabetes, and body mass index were adjusted
  3. Model 3: Model 2 + Annual household income was adjusted
  4. Model 4: Model 3 + Visiting a dental clinic for preventive care and hesitation to use medical and dental care were adjusted
  5. Model 5: Model 4 + Feel fear of job loss and psychological distress was adjusted
  6. Model 6: Model 5 + Smoking status was adjusted
  7. Abbreviation: PRR prevalence rate ratios, 95%CI 95% confidence interval
Back to article page

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us