Skip to main content

Table 4 Clinical case scenarios regarding MIH management and the responses of the study participants

From: Dentists’ perception, knowledge, and clinical management of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study

Question

GDPs

N = 115

N (%)

Paediatric Dentists

N = 41

N (%)

Other Dental Specialists

N = 65

N (%)

X 2

P value

CASE 1: 7 year old child with severely MIH affected tooth #16 and post eruptive breakdown

 PMCs

74

(64.3) b

34

(82.9) b

32

(49.2) a

17.242

0.028*

 Composite restoration & fissure sealant

23

(20.0) b

2

(5.0) a

19

(29.2) b

  

 GI restoration

11

(9.6)

3

(7.3)

5

(7.7)

  

 Extraction

3

(2.6)

1

(2.4)

2

(3.1)

  

 Not sure what to do

4

(3.5)

1

(2.4)

7

(10.8)

  

CASE 2: 6 year old child with moderate MIH on tooth #16

 PMCs

23

(20.0) b

10

(24.4) b

4

(6.2) a

28.294

.002*

 Composite restoration

55

(47.8) b

19

(46.3) b

18

(27.7) a

  

 Fissure sealant

13

(11.3)

1

(2.4)

14

(21.5)

  

 GI restoration

20

(14.4)

9

(22.0)

21

(32.3)

  

 Extraction

1

(0.9)

0

(0.0)

1

(1.5)

  

 Not sure what to do

3

(2.6)

2

(4.9)

7

(10.8)

  

CASE 3: 9 year old child with mild MIH affecting tooth #11

 Microabrasion

29

(25.2)

9

(22.0)

11

(16.9)

13.646

0.034*

 Etch, bleach, and seal with low viscosity resin (ICON ®)

29

(25.2) a

19

(46.3) b

30

(46.2) b

  

 Remove MIH affected area and restore with resin

49

(42.6)

11

(26.8)

17

(26.2)

  

 Not sure what to do

8

(7)

2

(4.9)

7

(10.8)

  
  1. * p < 0.05 = significant difference
  2. a-b values within rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) using post hoc test