Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics and results of the included studies

From: The clinical effects of laser preparation of tooth surfaces for fissure sealants placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Country

Design

Follow-up duration (months)

Number of patients (drop out)

Age range (years)

Tooth Location

Preparation method

Isolation

Sealant

Outcome variables

P value

Durmas 2017 [22]

Turkey

RCT, split-mouth

18

51 (9)

7–10

T: #26, #36 C: #16, #46

T: acid-etch+Er: YAG laser C: acid-etch

Cotton rolls

Grandio Seal (VOCO)

Retention rate, incidence of caries

Retention rate: 3mo P = 0.49; 6 mo

P = 0.31; 12 mo P = 0.01*; 18mo P = 0.02*;

Incidence of caries: P > 0.05

Kumar 2016 [23]

India

RCT, split-mouth

12

50 (3mo = 5; 6mo = 6; 9mo = 7; 12mo = 11)

6–12

#16, #26, #36, #46

T: Er, Cr: YSGG laser C: acid-etch

Rubber dam

Clinpro Sealant (3 M ESPE)

Retention rate, patient acceptability

Retention rate:

3mo P = 0.12; 6mo P = 0.76; 9mo P = 0.85; 12mo P = 0.78

Patient acceptability:

P = 1.000

Karaman 2013 [24]

Turkey

RCT, parallel design

24

16 (0)

20–23

Permanent premolars and molars

T: Er, Cr: YSGG laser C: acid-etch

Cotton rolls

Clinpro Sealant (3 M ESPE)

Retention rate, incidence of caries

Retention rate:

6mo P>0.05; 12mo P>0.05; 18mo P>0.05; 24mo P>0.05

Walsh 1996 [25]

Australia

RCT, split-mouth

36

20(12mo = 2; 18mo = 12;36mo = 19)

15–38

Permanent premolars and molars

T: carbon dioxide laser C: acid-etch

Cotton rolls

Delton Clear (Johon& Johnson Dental Care Company)

Retention rate

3mo NR; 6mo NR; 12mo P = 0.41

Shindova 2018 [26]

Bulgaria

RCT, parallel design

–

64 (0)

6–12

Intact teeth with no decay on the occlusal surface

T: Er: YAG laser+acid-etch C: acid-etch

Cotton rolls

Pit and fissure sealant (DMP Ltd)

Dental anxiety

P>0.05

  1. mo month, RCT Randomized comparison trial, Er: YAG Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet, Er, Cr: YSGG Erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-galium-garnet, NR Not reported, FS Fissure sealants, * statistically significant, T Test group, C Comprison group