From: Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner – an in vitro study
95%CI | p | |
---|---|---|
14BP | ||
Impression vs Mastercast | −0.031, 0.025 | 0.850 |
Mastercast vs Sectioned cast | −0.016, 0.002 | 0.103 |
Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner | 0.032, 0.063 | < 0.001* |
Impression vs Laboratory scanner | 0.003, 0.071 | 0.032* |
14MD | ||
Impression vs Mastercast | −0.027, 0.009 | 0.311 |
Mastercast vs Sectioned cast | −0.055, 0.009 | 0.152 |
Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner | 0.028, 0.084 | < 0.001* |
Impression vs Laboratory scanner | 0.008, 0.040 | 0.004* |
21BP | ||
Impression vs Mastercast | −0.702, − 0.168 | 0.001* |
Mastercast vs Sectioned cast | − 0.020, 0.050 | 0.411 |
Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner | 0.066, 0.119 | < 0.001* |
Impression vs Laboratory scanner | −0.592, − 0.063 | 0.015* |
21MD | ||
Impression vs Mastercast | 0.024, 0.079 | < 0.001* |
Mastercast vs Sectioned cast | −0.032, 0.044 | 0.747 |
Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner | −0.069, 0.001 | 0.060 |
Impression vs Laboratory scanner | −0.009, 0.057 | 0.152 |
24BP | ||
Impression vs Mastercast | 0.006, 0.047 | 0.011* |
Mastercast vs Sectioned cast | −0.019, − 0.004 | 0.002 * |
Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner | 0.056, 0.072 | < 0.001* |
Impression vs Laboratory scanner | 0.055, 0.103 | < 0.001* |
24MD | ||
Impression vs Mastercast | 0.024, 1.024 | 0.040 * |
Mastercast vs Sectioned cast | −0.288, 0.027 | 0.104 |
Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner | −0.297, 0.174 | 0.610 |
Impression vs Laboratory scanner | −0.051, 0.715 | 0.089 |
27BP | ||
Impression vs Mastercast | −0.064, − 0.042 | < 0.001* |
Mastercast vs Sectioned cast | −0.007, 0.014 | 0.487 |
Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner | 0.056, 0.083 | < 0.001* |
Impression vs Laboratory scanner | 0.010, 0.031 | < 0.001* |
27MD | ||
Impression vs Mastercast | −0.048, 0.031 | 0.663 |
Mastercast vs Sectioned cast | −0.017, 0.024 | 0.735 |
Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner | 0.008, 0.041 | 0.004* |
Impression vs Laboratory scanner | −0.013, 0.051 | 0.248 |