Skip to main content

Table 2 Significance levels of die diameters according to multilevel mixed-effect linear regression

From: Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner – an in vitro study

 95%CIp
14BP
 Impression vs Mastercast−0.031, 0.0250.850
 Mastercast vs Sectioned cast−0.016, 0.0020.103
 Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner0.032, 0.063< 0.001*
 Impression vs Laboratory scanner0.003, 0.0710.032*
14MD
 Impression vs Mastercast−0.027, 0.0090.311
 Mastercast vs Sectioned cast−0.055, 0.0090.152
 Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner0.028, 0.084< 0.001*
 Impression vs Laboratory scanner0.008, 0.0400.004*
21BP
 Impression vs Mastercast−0.702, − 0.1680.001*
 Mastercast vs Sectioned cast− 0.020, 0.0500.411
 Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner0.066, 0.119< 0.001*
 Impression vs Laboratory scanner−0.592, − 0.0630.015*
21MD
 Impression vs Mastercast0.024, 0.079< 0.001*
 Mastercast vs Sectioned cast−0.032, 0.0440.747
 Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner−0.069, 0.0010.060
 Impression vs Laboratory scanner−0.009, 0.0570.152
24BP
 Impression vs Mastercast0.006, 0.0470.011*
 Mastercast vs Sectioned cast−0.019, − 0.0040.002 *
 Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner0.056, 0.072< 0.001*
 Impression vs Laboratory scanner0.055, 0.103< 0.001*
24MD
 Impression vs Mastercast0.024, 1.0240.040 *
 Mastercast vs Sectioned cast−0.288, 0.0270.104
 Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner−0.297, 0.1740.610
 Impression vs Laboratory scanner−0.051, 0.7150.089
27BP
 Impression vs Mastercast−0.064, − 0.042< 0.001*
 Mastercast vs Sectioned cast−0.007, 0.0140.487
 Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner0.056, 0.083< 0.001*
 Impression vs Laboratory scanner0.010, 0.031< 0.001*
27MD
 Impression vs Mastercast−0.048, 0.0310.663
 Mastercast vs Sectioned cast−0.017, 0.0240.735
 Sectioned cast vs Laboratory scanner0.008, 0.0410.004*
 Impression vs Laboratory scanner−0.013, 0.0510.248
  1. Note: significant values are marked with *