Skip to main content

Table 6 Univariate and adjusted Cox regression analysis for teeth exfoliation (n = 125)

From: Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars; 36-month follow-up of a randomised control trial in a school setting

Variable

Total n (%)

HR Univariate 95% CI

p value

HR Adjusted 95% CI

p value

Group

     

ART (ref)

60 (92.3)

    

Hall Technique

65 (98.5)

1.60

1.05–2.45

0.030*

1.84

1.19–2.87

0.007*

Age (years)

     

5–6.9 (ref)

21 (87.5)

    

7–8.9

73 (93.3)

7.75

2.79–21.5

< 0.001*

8.89

3.17–24.88

< 0.001*

≥ 9

31 (96.9)

12.62

4.36–36.51

< 0.001*

17.08

5.76–50.62

< 0.001*

Sex

     

Male (ref)

75 (93.8)

    

Female

50 (98)

0.83

0.54–1.29

0.409

  

Jaw

     

Upper (ref)

76 (96.2)

    

Lower

49 (94.2)

1.00

0.65–1.53

0.994

  

Side

     

Right (ref)

66 (94.3)

    

Left

59 (96.7)

0.83

0.55–1.27

0.404

  

Tooth

     

1st primary molar (ref)

76 (92.7)

    

2nd primary molar

49 (100)

0.75

0.48–1.15

0.188

0.64

0.41–0.99

0.047*

  1. HR Hazard ratio, CI confidence Interval
  2. * Indicates statistically significance differences (p < 0.05)