Peer Review reports
From: Assessment of the reproducibility and precision of milling and 3D printing surgical guides
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sep 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Sep 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rasa Mladenovic |
| 23 Sep 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Anssari Moin |
| 23 Nov 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Sueli Mukai |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Nov 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 28 Nov 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rasa Mladenovic |
| 7 Dec 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Anssari Moin |
| 22 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 9 Jul 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Sueli Mukai |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Jul 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Aug 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 20 Oct 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Sueli Mukai |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Oct 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 Nov 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 8 Dec 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Sueli Mukai |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 8 Dec 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Dec 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Jan 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12903-020-01362-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.