Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary results of the association between polymorphism and NSCL/P risk in the meta-analysis

From: Association between 20q12 rs13041247 polymorphism and risk of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: a meta-analysis

Subgroup

Ethnicity

Genotype

No of studies

Test of association

Test of heterogeneity

OR(95%CI)

Z-test

P-value

Model

P-value

I2 (%)

rs13041247

East Asian

C vs T

8

0.847 (0.702–1.021)

1.74

0.082

R

0.000

87.2%

  

CC vs CT

8

0.837 (0.657–1.067)

1.43

0.151

R

0.001

72%

  

CC vs TT

8

0.725 (0.494–1.063)

1.65

0.100

R

0.000

86.8%

  

CC + CT vs TT

8

0.805 (0.630–1.029)

1.73

0.083

R

0.000

82.3%

  

CT + TT vs CC

8

1.265 (0.951–1.684)

1.61

0.106

R

0.000

82.1%

rs13041247

Caucasian

C vs T

2

0.936 (0.786–1.114)

0.75

0.454

F

0.358

0.0%

  

CC vs CT

2

1.197 (0.816–1.757)

0.92

0.358

F

0.193

41.0%

  

CC vs TT

2

0.988 (0.674–1.446)

0.06

0.949

F

0.237

28.4%

  

CC + CT vs TT

2

0.855 (0.677–1.081)

1.31

0.191

F

0.756

0.0%

  

CT + TT vs CC

2

0.918 (0.835–1.056)

0.47

0.641

F

0.187

42.6%

rs13041247

Overall

C vs T

13

0.874 (0.764–0.999)

1.98

0.048

R

0.000

80.2%

  

CC vs CT

13

0.904 (0.733–1.114)

0.98

0.325

R

0.000

69.8%

  

CC vs TT

13

0.767 (0.570–1.034)

1.74

0.082

R

0.000

81.4%

  

CT vs TT

13

0.839 (0.734–0.959)

2.57

0.010

R

0.0303

50.8%

  

CC + CT vs TT

13

0.824 (0.701–0.968)

2.35

0.019

R

0.000

69.7%

  

CT + TT vs CC

13

1.185 (0.934–1.503)

1.40

0.162

R

0.000

77.9%

  1. Abbreviations: C vs T, the allele model; CC vs CT, the heterozygote model; CC vs TT, the homozygote model;CC + CT vs TT, the recessive model; CT + TT vs CC, the dominant model; I2, I-squared; R, the random effect model; F, the fixed effect model