Skip to main content

Table 4 Negative binomial regression analysis describing the influence of covariates on manifest caries incidence at the 6 and 12-year follow-ups, respectively

From: Twelve years with a capitation payment system in Swedish dental care: longitudinal development of oral health

 

B

SE

IRR1

CI (95%)

p

6 years

12 years

6 years

12 years

6 years

12 years

6 years

12 years

6 years

12 years

Constant

− 0.87

− 1.43

0.093

0.114

0.42

0.24

0.35–0.50

0.19–0.30

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Payment system choice

          

DCH2 (Ref.)

    

1

1

    

FFS3

0.41

0.33

0.57

0.69

1.51

1.39

1.35–1.69

1.22–1.59

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Pre-baseline caries incidence

          

0 lesions (Ref.)

    

1

1

    

1–2 lesions

0.34

0.29

0.050

0.061

1.40

1.33

1.27–1.54

1.18–1.50

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 ≥ 3 lesions

0.97

0.88

0.067

0.078

2.63

2.42

2.31–3.00

2.08–2.82

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Age

          

years

− 0.01

− 0.01

0.002

0.002

0.99

0.99

0.98–0.99

0.99–0.99

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Education

          

 ≥ 13 years . (Ref.)

    

1

1

    

 ≤ 12 years

0.11

0.31

0.048

0.062

1.12

1.36

1.02–1.23

1.20–1.53

0.021

 < 0.001

Gender

          

(Ref)

    

1

1

    

− 0.02

0.21

0.044

0.054

0.98

1.24

0.90–1.07

1.11–1.38

0.649

 < 0.001

  1. 1 Incidence Rate Ratio
  2. 2 New capitation payment system,’Dental Care for Health’
  3. 3 Traditional Fee-for-Service payment system