Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between the presence of caries in permanent dentition and individual and familial factors in regression analysis

From: Individual and familial factors associated with caries and gingivitis among adolescents resident in a semi-urban community in South-Western Nigeria

Factors

APR (95% CI)

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Male versus female

1.01 (0.53, 1.92)

1.15 (0.64, 2.06)

1.01 (0.53, 1.91)

Age

1.14 (1.01, 1.29)a

1.23 (1.10, 1.39)a

1.18 (1.04, 1.34)a

Perception of oral health

1.01 (0.97, 1.05)

–

1.00 (0.96, 1.04)

Twice or more daily tooth brushing a day versus tooth-brushing less than twice daily

0.93 (0.32, 2.70)

–

0.84 (0.29, 2.45)

Always using fluoridated toothpaste versus not always using fluoridated toothpaste

0.91 (0.27, 3.09)

–

0.87 (0.25, 3.00)

Frequent versus non-frequent consumption of refined carbohydrates in-between-meals

1.20 (0.60, 2.40)

–

1.25 (0.62, 2.53)

Daily use of dental floss versus non-daily use of dental floss

0.72 (0.32, 1.62)

–

0.71 (0.31, 1.63)

Plaque index

0.91 (0.51, 1.61)

–

0.92 (0.52, 1.65)

First/only child versus second or more birth rank

–

1.30 (0.71, 2.40)

1.23 (0.63, 2.41)

Less than 6 versus 6 or more family size

–

1.26 (0.60, 2.67)

1.48 (0.59, 3.69)

Living with both parents versus not living with both parents

–

0.70 (0.32, 1.53)

0.42 (0.14, 1.24)

High versus low socioeconomic status

–

0.49 (0.24, 1.02)

0.40 (0.17, 0.91)a

Middle versus low socioeconomic status

–

0.74 (0.38, 1.45)

0.57 (0.27, 1.23)

LL

347.47

420.88

339.29

  1. APR adjusted prevalence ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. aStatistically significant at p < 0.05
  3. Model 1 includes individual factors
  4. Model 2 includes familial factors
  5. Model 3 includes individual and familial factors
  6. Adding the presence of moderate/severe gingivitis to Model 3, APR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.31, 4.33