Skip to main content

Table 5 Mean crestal bone loss (mesial) one year after placement by study variables

From: Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study

Study variables (pts = number of patientsa, n = number of implants)

Mean crestal bone loss mesially (SD) mm

Unadjusted β (95% CI)b p value

Adjusted β (95% CI)c p value

Gender

 Male (pts = 152, n = 610)

0.78 (0.73)

Ref

Ref

 Female (pts = 302, n = 1063)

0.72 (0.66)

 − 0.06 (− 0.17, 0.04)

0.00 (− 0.09, 0.09)

p = 0.233

p = 0.963

Age

 20–40 (pts = 124, n = 332)

0.63 (0.72)

Ref

Ref

 41–60 (pts = 198, n = 751)

0.68 (0.64)

0.06 (− 0.06, 0.18)

 − 0.10 (− 0.19, 0.00)

  > 60 (pts = 132, n = 590)

0.89 (0.70)

0.26 (0.13, 0.39)

 − 0.04 (− 0.15, 0.07)

p < 0.001

p = 0.104

Case type

 Single crown (n = 780)

0.30 (0.43)

Ref

Ref

 FDP group (n = 893)

1.13 (0.63)

0.86 (0.80, 0.92)

0.86 (0.81, 0.92)

p < 0.001

p < 0.001

Medical condition

 No (pts = 291, n = 1031)

0.67 (0.66)

Ref

Ref

 Yes (pts = 163, n = 642)

0.86 (0.71)

0.17 (0.07, 0.27)

0.07 (− 0.01, 0.15)

p = 0.001

p = 0.080

Smoking

 No (pts = 396, n = 1482)

0.75 (0.67)

Ref

Ref

 Yes (pts = 58, n = 191)

0.68 (0.79)

 − 0.01 (− 0.16, 0.14)

0.00 (− 0.13, 0.12)

p = 0.905

p = 0.988

Implant abutment connection

 Screw (n = 1607)

0.75 (0.69)

Ref

Ref

 Cement (n = 66)

0.56 (0.56)

 − 0.14 (− 0.33, 0.04)

 − 0.06 (− 0.21, 0.08)

p = 0.128

p = 0.394

Implant position (sextant)

 UR posterior (n = 347)

0.77 (0.73)

Ref

Ref

 Upper anterior (n = 176)

0.70 (0.60)

 − 0.10 (− 0.21, 0.02)

 − 0.15 (− 0.25, − 0.05)

 UL posterior (n = 277)

0.73 (0.69)

 − 0.01 (− 0.11, 0.09)

0.03 (− 0.05, 0.11)

 LL posterior (n = 389)

0.72(0.70)

 − 0.08 (− 0.17, 0.01)

 − 0.01 (− 0.09, 0.06)

 Lower anterior (n = 92)

1.16 (0.68)

0.28 (0.13, 0.42)

0.12 (0.00, 0.25)

 LR posterior (n = 392)

0.67 (0.64)

 − 0.08 (− 0.17, 0.01)

 − 0.01 (− 0.09, 0.06)

p < 0.001

p = 0.002

Implant manufacturer

 Ankylos (n = 1125)

0.75 (0.69)

Ref

Ref

 Astra (n = 51)

0.46 (0.50)

 − 0.30 (− 0.51, − 0.08)

 − 0.30 (− 0.47, − 0.13)

 Xive (n = 485)

0.76 (0.69)

0.07 (− 0.03, 0.17)

0.04 (− 0.04, 0.12)

 Frialit (n = 12)

0.58 (0.63)

 − 0.26 (− 0.67, 0.15)

 − 0.23 (− 0.56, 0.09)

p = 0.008

p < 0.001

Operator

 Maxillofacial (pts = 217, n = 854)

0.78 (0.70)

Ref

Ref

 Restorative (pts = 237, n = 819)

0.70 (0.68)

 − 0.02 (− 0.12, 0.08)

0.09 (0.02, 0.17)

p = 0.666

p = 0.018

  1. aNumber of patients (pts) is only presented for patient level variables
  2. bEstimates and confidence intervals derived from mixed linear regression models, implants clustered within patients
  3. cEstimates and confidence intervals derived from mixed linear regression models, implants clustered within patients, adjusted for all other factors in the table