Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the Dutch population from the Dutch National Oral Health Survey 1995–2013

From: Trends in socioeconomic inequality of periodontal health status among Dutch adults: a repeated cross-sectional analysis over two decades

 

1995

2002

2007

2013

P valueb

(n = 917)

(n = 795)

(n = 669)

(n = 702)

Age year, mean (SD)

38.1 (8.1)

40.7 (8.0)

41.1 (8.5)

40.2 (8.6)

.000

Age group, n (%)

    

.000

 25–34 y

353 (38.5)

211 (26.5)

177 (26.5)

217 (30.9)

 

 35–44 y

317 (34.6)

310 (39.0)

227 (33.9)

235 (33.5)

 

 45–54 y

247 (26.9)

274 (34.5)

265 (39.6)

250 (35.6)

 

Gender, n (%)

    

.000

 Male

450 (49.1)

318 (40.0)

304 (45.4)

284 (40.5)

 

 Female

467 (50.9)

477 (60.0)

365 (54.6)

418 (59.5)

 

Ethnicity, n (%) a

    

.000

 Native

831 (91.1)

639 (80.8)

576 (86.5)

636 (90.6)

 

 Non-native

81 (8.9)

152 (19.2)

90 (13.5)

66 (9.4)

 

Socioeconomic status, n (%)

    

.000

 Low

579 (63.1)

601 (75.6)

309 (46.2)

264 (37.6)

 

 High

338 (36.9)

194 (24.4)

360 (53.8)

438 (62.4)

 

Time since the last dental visit, n (%)a

    

.009

 More than 1 year

57 (6.2)

71 (8.9)

73 (10.9)

63 (9.0)

 

 Less than 1 year

859 (93.8)

723 (91.1)

595 (89.1)

638 (91.0)

 

Toothbrushing frequency, n (%)a

    

.000

  <  Once per day

254 (27.7)

218 (27.4)

122 (18.3)

182 (26.0)

 

  >  Twice per day

663 (72.3)

577 (72.6)

545 (81.7)

517 (74.0)

 

Floss usage, n (%) a

    

.000

 Non-daily

821 (89.5)

717 (90.2)

561 (84.4)

533 (75.9)

 

 Daily

96 (10.5)

78 (9.8v

104 (15.6)

169 (24.1)

 

Tooth pick usage, n (%)a

    

.000

 Non-daily

768 (83.8)

676 (85.0)

541 (81.5)

486 (69.2)

 

 Daily

149 (16.2)

119 (15.0)

123 (18.5)

216 (30.8)

 

Number of teeth present, mean (SD)

24.1 (5.3)

24.0 (5.4)

25.3 (4.1)

26.4 (3.1)

.000

  1. aMissing value for total study, ethnicity, n = 12 (0.4%); dental visit, n = 4 (0.1%); toothbrushing, n = 5 (0.2%); floss, n = 4 (0.1%); tooth pick, n = 5 (0.2%)
  2. bAll P-values were calculated with a two-sided significance level of .05
  3. SD standard deviation