Skip to main content

Table 1 Microhardness analysis of enamel followed by %REMH according to the treatments (means and standard error)

From: Effects of 45S5 bioactive glass on the remineralization of early carious lesions in deciduous teeth: an in vitro study

Groups

VHN0

VHN1

VHN2

%REMH

2%BAG

345.39 ± 7.43A

139.75 ± 8.29B

227.43 ± 4.41Ca

42.65 ± 1.35a

4%BAG

340.45 ± 15.62A

138.29 ± 6.14B

244.22 ± 4.47Cb

52.59 ± 2.96b

6%BAG

343.79 ± 10.15A

138.14 ± 5.40B

256.02 ± 3.91Cc

57.40 ± 1.72c

8%BAG

345.84 ± 6.97A

136.94 ± 1.44B

247.34 ± 4.51Cb

52.91 ± 2.55b

DDW(NC)

343.81 ± 5.56A

140.35 ± 8.40B

165.85 ± 3.64Cd

12.46 ± 2.81d

  1. Distinct superscript letters indicate statistical significance among the treatments
  2. BAG bioactive glass, VHN0 Vickers microhardness at baseline, VHN1 Vicker’s microhardness after demineralization, VHN2 Vickers microhardness after remineralization, %REMH recovery of enamel microhardness